Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=905 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease

Dry Eye Syndromes · Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

Enrolled (actual)
905
Serious AEs
0.3%
Results posted
Dec 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia at Visit 4 (Day 15) — -0.3812; -0.2371 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension (Drug); Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Primary completion
Sep 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia at Visit 4 (Day 15)
-0.3812; -0.2371
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 4 (Day 15)
-11.14; -9.24
SECONDARY
Proportion of Subjects With ≥ 1 Unit Improvement From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia Worst Region at Visit 4 (Day 15)
171; 127
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/ Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores at Visit 3 (Day 8)
-6.92; -4.86
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/Week 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Scores to Day 4
-5.09; -4.10
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/Week 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 4 (Day 15) in a Subgroup
-12.45; -9.45
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores at Day 3 (Diary)
-3.28; -3.15
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Eye Dryness Scores at Visit 4 (Day 15)
-14.0; -11.5
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Eye Dryness Scores at Visit 3 (Day 8)
-9.6; -8.0
SECONDARY
Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores on Day 2 (Diary) Minus Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1)
-2.33; -2.43
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Frequency Scores at Visit 4 (Day 15)
-10.20; -8.38
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Subject-rated Ocular Discomfort Frequency Scores at Visit 3 (Day 8)
-5.96; -4.42
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score at Visit 4 (Day 15)
-0.6; -0.5
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Nasal Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score at Visit 4 (Day 15)
-0.6; -0.4

Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects who have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease. The product will be studied over 14 days, with 1-2 drops instilled in each eye four times daily (QID).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease in both eyes

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the investigational product(s) or components
  • History of glaucoma, IOP>21 mmHg at the screening or randomization visits, or being treated for glaucoma in either eye.
  • Diagnosis of: ongoing ocular infection; severe/serious ocular condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; or have been exposed to an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening.
  • In the opinion of the Investigator or study coordinator, be unwilling or unable to comply with study protocol or unable to successfully instill eye drops.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02819284). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search