Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=680 Treatment

A Study of Ocrelizumab in Participants With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) Who Have Had a Suboptimal Response to an Adequate Course of Disease-Modifying Treatment (DMT)

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Enrolled (actual)
680
Serious AEs
7.4%
Results posted
Feb 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as Per Protocol Defined Events During a 96-Week Period — 74.8 Percentage of Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Ocrelizumab (Biological)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Primary completion
Oct 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as Per Protocol Defined Events During a 96-Week Period
74.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Free From a Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity During 24 Weeks Period
87.1
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Free From a Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity During 48 Weeks Period
82.6
SECONDARY
Time to First Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity
NA
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
2.09; -0.02; 0.01; -0.03; -0.01
SECONDARY
Absolute Change From Baseline in EDSS Category at Week 96
13.4; 72.2; 14.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline EDSS Score ≥2 With CDI at Week 96
17.3
SECONDARY
Annualized Protocol-defined Relapse Rate at Week 96
0.030
SECONDARY
Time to Onset of 24-week Confirmed Disability Progression
NA
SECONDARY
Time to Onset of First Protocol-Defined Relapse
NA
SECONDARY
Time to Onset of First New and/or Enlarging T2 Lesion
NA
SECONDARY
Mean Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48 and 96
0.004; 0.004; NA
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Total T2 Lesion Volume Detected by Brain MRI From
-558.6
SECONDARY
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Total T2 Lesion Volume Detected by Brain MRI
-8.5
SECONDARY
Volume of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Volume of Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48, 96
21.4; 23.1; 3.7
SECONDARY
Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Per MRI Scan
0.053; 0.009; 0.011
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion Volume
-416.5; -528.5
SECONDARY
Percentage Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion Volume
-4.0; -12.5
SECONDARY
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion Volume
-461.8; -576.5
SECONDARY
Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Brain Volume
-0.153; -0.445; -0.805
SECONDARY
Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Cortical Grey Matter Volume
-0.312; -0.618
SECONDARY
Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in White Matter Volume
-0.382; -0.745
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Score
53.8; 2.5; 1.3
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Score
25.0; -1.9; -1.5
SECONDARY
Percentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Score
7.2; 4.8
SECONDARY
Percentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Score
-4.4; -2.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
89.1; 57.8; 7.2; 9.4; 0.1; 0

Summary

The purpose of this prospective, multicenter, open-label, efficacy, and safety study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in participants with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) who have had a suboptimal response to an adequate course of a Disease-Modifying Treatment (DMT). The study will consist of a Screening period (up to 4 weeks), an Open-label treatment period (96 weeks; with last dose administered at Week 72), and a Follow-up period of at least 2 years.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Have a definite diagnosis of RRMS, confirmed as per the revised McDonald 2010 criteria
  • Have a length of disease duration, from first symptom, of less than (<) 10 years
  • Have received no more than two prior DMTs, and the discontinuation of the most recent DMT was due to lack of efficacy
  • Suboptimal disease control while on a DMT
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 0.0 to 4.0, inclusive, at Screening
  • For women of childbearing potential: agreement to use an acceptable birth control method during the treatment period and for at least 6 months after the last dose of study drug

Exclusion Criteria

  • Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) or history of primary progressive or progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS)
  • Inability to complete an Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) procedure
  • Known presence of other neurological disorders
  • Any concomitant disease that may require chronic treatment with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants during the course of the study
  • History or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
  • History of opportunistic infections
  • History or known presence of recurrent or chronic infection
  • History of malignancy
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Known active bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial infection or other infection, excluding fungal infection of nail beds
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02861014). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search