Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=17 Treatment

Clinical Algorithm for Post-Stroke Gait Training With C-Brace

Hemiparesis Due to Stroke · Hemiplegia Due to Stroke

Enrolled (actual)
17
Serious AEs
6.7%
Results posted
Nov 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Gait Quality as Indicated by Joint Excursion as Assessed by Kinematic Analysis — 33.98; 9.34; 21.25; 34.51 degrees

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
C-Brace (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Primary completion
Jan 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Gait Quality as Indicated by Joint Excursion as Assessed by Kinematic Analysis
38.80; 9.03; 22.75; 34.93; 7.92; 16.18
PRIMARY
Gait Quality as Indicated by Joint Excursion as Assessed by Kinematic Analysis
38.80; 9.03; 22.75; 34.93; 7.92; 16.18
PRIMARY
Change in Muscle Function as Indicated by EMG Amplitude Assessed by Surface Electromyography (sEMG)
0.2639; 0.2776; 0.3312; 0.2149; 0.2146; 0.2795
PRIMARY
Change in Muscle Function as Indicated by EMG Amplitude Assessed by Surface Electromyography (sEMG)
0.2639; 0.2776; 0.3312; 0.2149; 0.2146; 0.2795
PRIMARY
Metabolic Expenditure During Walking
0.03
PRIMARY
Metabolic Expenditure During Walking
0.03
SECONDARY
Score on the Timed Up and Go Test
19.09
SECONDARY
Score on the Timed Up and Go Test
19.09
SECONDARY
Score on the Timed Up and Go Test
19.09
SECONDARY
Mental State as Assessed by the Folstein Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
28.43
SECONDARY
Mental State as Assessed by the Folstein Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
28.43
SECONDARY
Change in Hip Flexors Strength as Assessed by Dynamometry
SECONDARY
Change in Hip Extensors Strength as Assessed by Dynamometry
SECONDARY
Change in Hip Abductors Strength as Assessed by Dynamometry
SECONDARY
Change in Hip Adductors Strength as Assessed by Dynamometry
SECONDARY
Change in Knee Flexors Strength as Assessed by Dynamometry
SECONDARY
Change in Knee Extensors Strength as Assessed by Dynamometry
SECONDARY
Change in Ankle Dorsiflexors Strength as Assessed by Dynamometry
SECONDARY
Change in Ankle Plantarflexors. Strength as Assessed by Dynamometry
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Bilateral Hip Range of Motion Within Normal Limits as Assessed by Goniometry
13; 11; 12; 11; 13; 14
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Bilateral Hip Range of Motion Within Normal Limits as Assessed by Goniometry
13; 11; 12; 11; 13; 14
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Knee Joint Range of Motion Within Normal Limits as Assessed by Goniometry
12; 14; 14; 14
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Knee Joint Range of Motion Within Normal Limits as Assessed by Goniometry
12; 14; 14; 14
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Ankle Joint Range of Motion Within Normal Limits as Assessed by Goniometry
6; 12; 14; 14
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Ankle Joint Range of Motion Within Normal Limits as Assessed by Goniometry
6; 12; 14; 14
SECONDARY
Motor Impairment as Determined by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment
24.29
SECONDARY
Motor Impairment as Determined by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment
24.29
SECONDARY
Spasticity as Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
0.18; 0.07; 0.32; 0.64; 0; 0.57
SECONDARY
Spasticity as Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
0.18; 0.07; 0.32; 0.64; 0; 0.57
SECONDARY
Static Balance as Assessed by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
49.79
SECONDARY
Static Balance as Assessed by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
49.79
SECONDARY
Gait Speed as Assessed by the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
0.73
SECONDARY
Gait Speed as Assessed by the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
0.73
SECONDARY
Gait Speed as Assessed by the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
0.73
SECONDARY
Aerobic Capacity as Assessed by Peak VO₂ Per Kilogram Body Weight During the Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT)
0.030
SECONDARY
Aerobic Capacity as Assessed by Peak VO₂ Per Kilogram Body Weight During the Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT)
0.030
SECONDARY
Aerobic Capacity as Assessed by Peak VO₂ Per Kilogram Body Weight During the Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT)
0.030

Summary

The purpose of this study is to develop a clinical algorithmic-based evaluation and treatment approach for C-Brace for use by persons with hemiparesis or hemiplegia due to stroke.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 - 65 years
  • Diagnosis of hemiparesis or hemiplegia following stroke
  • Presence of abnormal walking pattern
  • Poor knee control during stance phase
  • Cognitive ability to (or care provider) manage daily charging of battery
  • Cognitive ability to follow commands
  • Hip flexor muscle strength grade 3 or greater or the ability to perform reciprocal gait using compensatory patterns

Exclusion Criteria

  • Weight > 275 lbs. (Includes body weight and weight of heaviest object carried)
  • Less than 2° of ankle motion
  • Severe spasticity of the quadriceps (MAS >3) and/or uncontrolled spasticity of the quadriceps
  • Severe spasticity of other lower limb muscles (MAS >3)
  • Fixed genuvalgum exceeding 10° beyond anatomic neutral valgum
  • Any fixed genuvarum exceeding anatomic neutral varum.
  • Hip or knee flexion contractures greater than 10°
  • Presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Chronic heart failure - New York Heart Association (NYHA) stages 3 and 4
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02892760). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search