Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=30,430

Use of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents and Neuromuscular Monitoring in 7 Danish Teaching Hospitals

Neuromuscular Blockade

Enrolled (actual)
30,430
Serious AEs
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With and Without Objective Neuromuscular Monitoring (Acceleromyography) in Cases Receiving a Non-depolarizing Neuromuscular Blocking Agent (NMBA) (Yes/no) — 14463; 2062 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Rocuronium (Drug); Succinylcholine (Drug); Cisatracurium (Drug); Mivacurium (Drug); Objective neuromuscular monitoring (acceleromyography) (Device); Sugammadex (Drug); Neostigmine (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 15+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Jakob Louis Thomsen
Primary completion
Jun 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With and Without Objective Neuromuscular Monitoring (Acceleromyography) in Cases Receiving a Non-depolarizing Neuromuscular Blocking Agent (NMBA) (Yes/no)
14463; 2062
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With and Without Objective Neuromuscular Monitoring (Acceleromyography) in Cases Receiving a Depolarizing NMBA (Succinylcholine) (Yes/no)
4224; 9681
SECONDARY
Last Recorded Train-of-four (TOF) Ratio Before Tracheal Extubation or Removal of Supraglottic Airway Device in Patients Receiving a Non-depolarizing NMBA
0.97
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With and Without Administration of Sugammadex in Cases Receiving a Non-depolarizing NMBA (Yes/no)
145; 12945
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With and Without Administration of Neostigmine in Cases Receiving a Non-depolarizing NMBA (Yes/no)
8570; 7955
SECONDARY
Time in Minutes From Tracheal Extubation or Removal of Supraglottic Airway Device to Discharge From Post-anaesthesia Care Unit in Cases Involving a Non-depolarizing NMBA With and Without Neuromuscular Monitoring, Respectively
97
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With and Without Mild Oxygen Desaturation (<90%, But >80%) in Cases Receiving a Non-depolarizing NMBA
1753; 14230
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With and Without Severe Oxygen Desaturation (<80%) in Cases Receiving a Non-depolarizing NMBA
295; 15688

Summary

Aim: To explore * the frequency of use of objective neuromuscular monitoring for assessment of depth of neuromuscular blockade in general anaesthesia * the incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade, and * the timing of reversal of the neuromuscular blockade at the end of anaesthesia. We will collect data from 7 Danish anaesthesia departments, using data from the Anaesthesia Information Management System (AIMS).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Patients who received general anaesthesia with neuromuscular blockade in one of the 7 hospitals providing data for the study in the last 18 months up until the time of data collection

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02914119). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search