Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=23 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Connecting Contact Lenses and Digital Technology

Asthenopia · Contact Lenses · Ocular Accommodation · Convergence, Excess

Enrolled (actual)
23
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Subjective Symptom Improvement — 153.9; 100.7; 272.13 score on a scale — p=0.07

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Test Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses (Device); Control Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses (Device)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
State University of New York College of Optometry
Primary completion
Nov 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Subjective Symptom Improvement
153.9; 100.7; 272.13 0.07
SECONDARY
Lens Preference
7; 15
SECONDARY
Lag of Accommodation in Study Lenses
1.52; 1.23; 1.06; 0.75; 0.00; 0.22 0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS)
11.2; 10.8 0.77
SECONDARY
Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire- 8 Survey (CLDEQ-8)
11.7; 11.0 0.69
SECONDARY
Near Phoria at 40cm in Multifocal Contact Lens vs Single Vision Contact Lens
2.3; 2.0 0.87

Summary

This study seeks to address whether or not different types of daily disposable soft contact lenses may be a beneficial option for patients complaining of eye strain and visual discomfort while using digital devices.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 to 35 years of age
  • Spectacle prescription of -0.75 to -6.00 D sphere with no more than 0.75 diopters of refractive cylinder
  • Current single-vision soft contact lens wearer
  • Monocular acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye (Snellen)
  • Self-reported minimum of 6 hours a day on digital devices
  • Self-reported complaint of eyestrain on digital devices
  • No ocular pathology and/or history of eye surgery
  • No history of strabismus or strabismus surgery
  • No gas permeable lens wear for at least 3 months
  • Subjects may not be optometrists, opticians or optometry students

Exclusion Criteria

  • Corneal staining, blepharitis and/or Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) worse than Grade 2 using the Efron Grading Scale
  • Negative Relative Accommodation (NRA) less than +1.50 D
  • Exophoria at near > 6 prism diopters10
  • Vertical phoria > 1 prism diopter
  • Presence of tropia
  • Response of 3 or higher on question 2b of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire- 8 (CLDEQ-8)
  • Unacceptable contact lens fit (i.e. substantially decentered, excessive movement)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02921087). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search