Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=60 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Electrical Stimulation Effect on Coronally Advanced Flap

Gingival Recession, Generalized

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Defect Coverage — 79.47; 85.97 percentage of root coverage

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
CAF (Procedure); ES (Device); SHAM (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Primary completion
Sep 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Defect Coverage
79.47; 85.97
SECONDARY
Root Coverage Esthetic Score
8.03; 7.9

Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate clinically and through the concentration of inflammatory markers, the results of 6 months of electrical stimulation associated with coronally advanced flap for treatment of gingival recession.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients presenting Miller class I or II gingival recession in the maxillary canines or premolars
  • Visible cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) with pulp vitality;
  • Patients presenting no signs of active periodontal disease and full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤20%;
  • Patients older than 18 years old; probing depth ˂3 mm in the included teeth;
  • Patients who agreed to participate and signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients presenting systemic problems that would contraindicate the surgical procedure;
  • Patients taking medications known to interfere with the wound healing process or that contraindicate the surgical procedure;
  • Smokers or pregnant women;
  • Patients who underwent periodontal surgery in the area of interest;
  • Patients with orthodontic therapy in progress.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02987231). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search