Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=32 Randomized Basic Science

DryShield vs Cotton Roll Isolation During Sealants Placement: Efficiency and Patient Preference

Time · Patient Preference

Enrolled (actual)
32
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Placement Time of Sealants Using Dryshield (DS) vs Cotton Rolls (CRI) — 164.88; 160.50; 164.56; 167.81 Seconds

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
DryShield (Device); Cotton rolls (Other)
Age
Pediatric · 5+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Primary completion
Mar 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Placement Time of Sealants Using Dryshield (DS) vs Cotton Rolls (CRI)
164.88; 160.50; 164.56; 167.81
PRIMARY
Patient Preference as Assessed by Verbal Self-report Survey
7; 4; 5; 1; 1; 4

Summary

The goals of this study are to determine if 1) placement times of pit and fissure sealants using the DryShield system differ from those when using the cotton roll isolation technique; and 2) there is a significant difference in patient preference between Dryshield and the cotton roll technique.

Eligibility Criteria

The target population will include healthy, cognitively normal patients who present to one of the Montefiore pediatric dental clinics for an intake or a recall visit who are determined to benefit from sealants application, or patients who present solely for a sealant application appointment, when their examination was completed at a previous date (within 6 months).

Inclusion Criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Classification I or II
  • Ages 5 to 14 years
  • Cooperative behavior at present visit or recorded at the previous encounter (classified as 3 or 4 on the Frankl Behavioral Rating Scale).
  • At least one erupted caries-free permanent molar in each quadrant
  • Ability able to speak and understand English or Spanish
  • There will be no exclusions based on race, gender, and ethnicity.

Exclusion Criteria

  • ASA Classification III or higher
  • Uncooperative behavior at present visit or recorded at the previous encounter (classified as 1 or 2 on the Frankl Behavioral Rating Scale).
  • Patients who require less than four sealants on permanent molars
  • Patients who do not provide assent or consent.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02995369). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search