Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=256 Other

T790M Plasma Testing Methodology Comparison and Clinical Validation

Lung Cancer

Enrolled (actual)
256
Serious AEs
Results posted
Mar 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Concordance — 91.3; 66.8; 82.7; 86.1 percentage of aggrement

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
T790M+ Testing (Procedure); Baseline Visit Blood & Urine Testing (Procedure); Baseline ECG (Procedure); Visual Slit-Lamp Testing (Procedure); AZD9291 Dosing (Drug); Plasma AZD9291 testing (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Primary completion
Oct 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Concordance
91.3; 66.8; 82.7; 86.1; 71.0; 88.3
PRIMARY
PFS Using Investigator Assessments According to RECIST v1.1
9.7; 10.6; 10.6; 9.7; 11.0; 10.5
SECONDARY
Testing Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV
94.7; 90.5; 98.9; 98.9; 89.3; 52.5
SECONDARY
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
56.3; 60.7; 62.4; 54.1; 62.0; 59.1
SECONDARY
75% OS Duration
9.7; 10.5; 10.7; 8.7; 11.9; 10.6

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate concordance of T790M mutation plasma testing between the Cobas test and each of other platforms: Super-ARMS, digital PCR or NGS. And to assess the efficacy of AZD9291 monotherapy by assessment of PFS in adult patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who have received prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and are T790M mutation positive detected by any one of the four plasma testing platforms: Cobas/Super-ARMS/ digital PCR/NGS.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
  • Adults (according to China regulations for age of majority)
  • Histological or cytological confirmed locally advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC, not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy.
  • Patients who have progressed following prior therapy with an EGFR-TKI agent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who disagree to participate this study.
  • Patients whose medical objection was recorded to use the existing data from medical practice for scientific research.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02997501). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search