Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=202 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Evaluation of Renvela in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Not On Dialysis And Hyperphosphatemia In China

Hyperphosphatemia

Enrolled (actual)
202
Serious AEs
28.2%
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Week 8 — 2.090; 2.095; 0.010; -0.200 mmol/L — p=<0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Placebo (Drug); Sevelamer Carbonate (GZ419831) (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Sanofi
Primary completion
Aug 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Week 8
2.090; 2.095; 0.010; -0.200 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 8
-0.115; -0.830
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8
-0.030; -0.830
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Calcium-Phosphorus Product at Week 8
0.0200; -0.4960
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (Ipth) Level at Week 8
7.2380; 0.0000
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Reaching the Target Serum Phosphorus Level (4.6 mg/dL [1.49 mmol/L]) at Week 8
6.6; 15.5
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Level at Week 4
-0.020; -0.240
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event
86; 83; 31; 26; 21; 12
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters
59; 54; 0; 0; 9; 6
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic Parameters
0; 2; 1; 1; 5; 6
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes
1; 3; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function Parameters
84; 89; 15; 33; 3; 3
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters
1; 0; 1; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities
0; 0; 17; 12; 0; 0

Summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate efficacy of Renvela tablets in the reduction of serum phosphorus in hyperphosphatemia in participants with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis. Secondary Objectives: To document the efficacy of Renvela tablets in the reduction of serum lipids (total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]). To document the efficacy of Renvela tablets in the reduction of calcium-phosphorus product. To document the efficacy of Renvela tablets in the reduction of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH). To document the efficacy of Renvela tablets in proportion of participants reaching the target serum phosphorus level 4.6 milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL) (1.47 millimoles per litre [mmol/L], inclusive). To evaluate safety of Renvela tablets.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants with chronic kidney disease who had not been on dialysis, and were not expected to begin dialysis, or renal transplantation in the next 4 months from the screening visit.
  • Had serum phosphorus measurement greater than or equal to (>=) 5.5 mg/dL (1.78 mmol/L) at screening visit (if participants were not on phosphate binder[s] at Screening Visit) OR at the end of Washout Period (if participants were on phosphate binder[s] at screening visit).
  • Had the following laboratory measurements at screening visit:
  • 25-hydroxy vitamin D >=10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL).
  • intact parathyroid hormone, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) <=800 picograms per millilitre (pg/mL).
  • Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Men or women below 18 years of age.
  • Any technical/administrative reason that made it impossible to randomize the participant in the study.
  • Was not of the level of understanding and willingness to cooperate with all visits and procedures, as described in the study protocol.
  • Not yet received chronic kidney disease diet education before screening visit.
  • Not willing and not able to avoid changes to diet during the study.
  • Not willing or able to maintain screening doses of lipid lowering medication, 1, 25 dihydroxy vitamin D, and/or cinacalcet for the duration of the study, except for safety reasons.
  • Not willing or not able to avoid antacids and phosphate binders containing aluminium, magnesium, calcium, or lanthanum for the duration of the study unless prescribed as an evening calcium supplement.
  • Had participated in any other investigational drug studies within 30 days, or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening visit.
  • Conditions/situations such as:
  • Participant was the Investigator or any Subinvestigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol.
  • Uncooperative or any condition that could make the participant potentially non-compliant to the study procedures (for example, participants could not be contacted by phones as required in phone call visits).
  • Evidence of active malignancy.
  • Not on stable medical condition (for example, but not limited to, active ethanol or drug abuse [tobacco use acceptable]; documented poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, poorly controlled hypertension, active vasculitis, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection), or had any clinically significant medical conditions.
  • Had known hypersensitivity to sevelamer or any constituents of Renvela tablets.
  • Had bowel obstruction, active dysphagia or swallowing disorder, or a predisposition to or current bowel obstruction, ileus, or severe gastrointestinal motility disorders including severe constipation.
  • Using or plan to use anti-arrhythmic or anti-seizure medications for arrhythmia or seizure disorders.
  • Was pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • If the participant was female, and of childbearing potential (pre-menopausal and not surgically sterile), was not willing to use an effective contraceptive method throughout the study.
  • Had any condition, which in the opinion of the investigator would prohibit the participant's inclusion in the study.

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03001011). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search