Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=24 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

A Clinical Comparison of 2 Multifocal Toric XR (Extended Range) Contact Lenses

Astigmatism
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03006458 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
24
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Stability — 3.2; 2.9 units on a scale

Summary

This study aims to compare the clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the comfilcon A and the omafilcon B soft contact lenses.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Stability
3.2; 2.5
PRIMARY
Overall Toric Lens Fit Acceptance
3.5; 2.8
PRIMARY
Comfort
79.8; 70.6
PRIMARY
Overall Satisfaction
63.0; 63.3
PRIMARY
Dryness
80.4; 77.2
PRIMARY
Visual Fluctuation/ Stability
81.0; 73.8
PRIMARY
Handling
84.5; 85.8
PRIMARY
Quality of Near Vision
38.5; 56.4
PRIMARY
Quality of Intermediate Vision
50.2; 65.3
PRIMARY
Quality of Distance Vision
86.2; 67.3
PRIMARY
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Day
87.3; 76.2
PRIMARY
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Night
78.0; 67.0
PRIMARY
Ghosting at Near
66.5; 78.1
PRIMARY
Ghosting at Distance
83.3; 86.9

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects will only be eligible for the study if:
  • They are aged 40 - 70 years, inclusive.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They have successfully completed the non-dispensing study (C16-597) as the lenses to be worn on this study (C16-599) are predetermined from their participation on study C16-597.
  • They have a contact lens spherical prescription between +10.00 to -10.00D (Diopters) (inclusive).
  • They have astigmatism between of -0.75 and -5.75DC (based on the calculated ocular refraction) in each eye.
  • They have an Add component to their spectacle refraction (between +0.75 and

+2.50DS).

  • They can be satisfactorily fitted with the study lenses.
  • They can attain at least 0.30 logMAR binocular distance high contrast visual acuity with the study lenses within the available power range.
  • They have successfully worn soft contact lenses in the last two years.
  • They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least five days per week and for at least six hours per day).
  • They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study.
  • They own a wearable pair of spectacles.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if:
  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They have had cataract surgery.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • They have any clinically meaningful slit lamp findings contraindicating contact lens wear (e.g. ≥ Grade 3 finding of oedema, corneal neovascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection, blepharitis/meibomian gland dysfunction) on the Efron classification scale or any other ocular abnormality that in the opinion of the investigator would contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis) which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
  • They have a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
  • They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03006458). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search