Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=286 Other

A New and Innovative Method for CO2 Removal in Anesthetic Circuits

Anesthesia

Enrolled (actual)
286
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2026
Primary outcome: Primary: End-tidal CO2 Concentration (%) — 5.069; 5.096 % end-tidal CO2

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
memsorb (Device)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
DMF Medical Incorporated
Primary completion
May 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
End-tidal CO2 Concentration (%)
5.069; 5.096

Summary

The drawbacks of chemical CO2 absorbers include the production of compounds harmful to patients that also lead into increased cost and environmental impact, as well as the daily disposal of compound special waste. Sustainable management of general anesthesia is a growing concern. Continually diluting anesthetic circuits, and the disposal of chemical granulate are serious environmental problems.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class I, II, III (low-medium risk patient)
  • English-speaking patients

Exclusion Criteria

  • Self-reported as pregnant
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class IV (high risk patient)
  • Patients scheduled for emergency surgery
  • Documented respiratory disease, including COPD and severe asthma
  • Documented elevated pressure in the brain (intra cranial pressure, ICP)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03014336). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search