Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=40 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

A More Physiological Feeding Process in ICU:the Intermittent Infusion With Semi-solidification of Nutrients

Nutrition, Enteral

Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: the Ratio of the Enteral Nutrition — 0.98; 0.73 ratio

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
semi-solid agent with standard enteral feeding (Dietary_supplement); standard enteral feeding (Other)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 14+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Primary completion
Mar 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
the Ratio of the Enteral Nutrition
0.98; 0.73
SECONDARY
the Patient of Feeding Intolerance(FI)
8; 2 0.05
SECONDARY
the Patients With Lung Infection
8; 7 0.05
SECONDARY
30-days Mortality
3; 2; 11; 12 0.05
SECONDARY
the Glycemic Variability(GV)
7.514; 8.457; 8.336; 9.700; 9.229; 9.664
SECONDARY
Length of Hospital Stay (LOS)
20.07; 14.36 <0.05 sig

Summary

Malnutrition and underfeeding are major challenges in caring for critically ill patients. Continuous feeding were thought to be better tolerated by patients with the limited absorptive gut surface area or gastrointestinal dysfunction, but associated with more tube clogging and required the patient to be attached to an infusion pump for significant periods of time. Intermittent infusion resembled more physiological feeding process, which allowed greater patient mobility and might reach goal enteral calories earlier, and the latter were considered to effectively decrease the length of stay (LOS)-in-hospital and mortality. However, it also had some previous study found that intermittent infusion had more complications, such as diarrhea, regurgitation than continuous. Some study found that it was an efficient way to prevent aspiration and reflux by increasing the enteral nutrient solution viscosity and improve bolus intermittent feeding intolerance. The primary goal of this was to study whether receiving semi-solidification of nutrients could increase the percent prescribed calories received by improving the feeding intolerance, and secondary goal was to observing the effect of semi-solid nutrient to the LOS of ICU and in-hospital, lung infection, 30-days mortality and the glycemic variability (GV).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

(1)14 years and older, who received EN for more than 72 hours, were eligible for inclusion (2) all patients started on EN by nasogastric tube

Exclusion Criteria

  • received EN <72 hours
  • received EN prior to ICU admission
  • had acute pulmonary infection
  • had history of Gastrointestinal surgery
  • had contraindications of EN, such as intestinal obstruction (mechanical or paralytic ileus).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03017079). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search