Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=1,066 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide and Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate in Stabile COPD Patients

COPD

Enrolled (actual)
1,066
Serious AEs
8.2%
Results posted
Mar 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) — 0.248; 0.156; 0.138; -0.050 Litres — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Aclidinium bromide/formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination (Drug); Aclidinium bromide (Drug); Formoterol Fumarate (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 40+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Primary completion
Apr 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
0.248; 0.156; 0.138; -0.050 <0.001 sig
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate
0.081; 0.050; -0.004; -0.084 <0.001 sig
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide
0.081; 0.050; -0.004; -0.084 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1
0.324; 0.225; 0.191; 0.008 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Improvements Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score
2.9; 2.6; 2.4; 2.1 0.005 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
-8.7; -7.6; -7.2; -4.7 0.003 sig

Summary

This is a multiple dose, randomised, parallel, double blind, double dummy, multicentre and multinational Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of Aclidinium bromide/Formoterol fumarate compared with individual components and placebo and Aclidinium bromide compared with Placebo when administered to patients with stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1. Adult male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients aged ≥40
  • 2. Patients with a diagnosis of COPD prior to Visit 1 (screening)
  • 3. Patients with moderate to severe stable COPD (Stage II or Stage III) at Visit 1: post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥30% and 470 msec as indicated in the centralised reading report assessed at Screening (Visit 1)
  • 13. Patients with clinically significant abnormalities in the clinical laboratory tests, ECG parameters (other than QTcF) or in the physical examination at Visit 1 (screening)
  • 14. Patients with abnormal liver function tests defined as Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or total bilirubin ≥ 2.5 times upper limit of normal ranges at screening
  • 15. Patient with known non-controlled history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus and/or active hepatitis
  • 16. Patient with a history of hypersensitivity reaction to inhaled anticholinergic drugs, sympathomimetic amines, inhaled medication or any component thereof
  • 17. Patient with known narrow-angle glaucoma, symptomatic bladder neck obstruction, acute urinary retention, or patients with symptomatic non-stable prostatic hypertrophy
  • 18. History of malignancy of any organ system (including lung cancer), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years other than basal or squamous cell skin cancer
  • 19. Any other serious or uncontrolled physical or mental dysfunction
  • 20. Patients with a history (within 2 years prior to Visit 1 (screening) of drug and/or alcohol abuse that may prevent study compliance based on the Investigator judgment
  • 21. Patients unlikely to be cooperative or cannot comply with the study procedures
  • 22. Patients treated with any investigational drug within 30 days (or 6 half-lives, whichever is longer) prior to screening
  • 23. Patients who intended to use any concomitant medication not permitted by this protocol or who had not undergone the required washout period for a particular prohibited medication
  • 24. Patients unable to give consent, or patients of consenting age but under guardianship, or vulnerable patients
  • 25. Any other conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, might have indicated the patient to be unsuitable for the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03022097). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search