Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=37 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Custom Pack in Spine Surgery

Bone Diseases · Spine Cancer · Spine Osteoarthritis

Enrolled (actual)
37
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Soft Tissue Dissecting Time — 38.6; 34 minues

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
custom pack (Other); standard care (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Primary completion
Jun 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Soft Tissue Dissecting Time
38.6; 34
SECONDARY
Surgery Time
SECONDARY
Postoperative Complications
SECONDARY
Numbers of Materials Wasted
SECONDARY
Blood Loss
SECONDARY
Pain (Score on the "Numeric Rating Scale")
SECONDARY
Length of Stay

Summary

Recent evidence suggests the efficacy of "custom pack" procedure on the operators reduction time and on the contamination risk due to the opening of many sterile packs. Nevertheless ,the studies available are sponsored by the industry and their results are very few. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation and reliability of spine surgery "custom pack" efficacy in adult patients obtained in the reduction of surgery time, relative risks, and materials wasted compared with the standard surgical field procedure practice .

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Degenerative spinal disease from 2 to 4 levels,
  • Oncologic spine disease with only decompression and stabilization.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Revision surgeries,
  • Minimally invasive interventions,
  • Interventions that provide a dual access, and
  • Patients who refuse consent to experimentation.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03050203). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search