Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=100

CTEPH Identification an Standard Computerised Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Pulmonary Embolism Patients

CTEPH · Pulmonary Embolism · Early Diagnosis

Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: To Identify the Accuracy of Routine CTPA for the Distinction of CTEPH From Acute PE. — 70; 70 Sensitivity

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
The initial CTPA will be reviewed (Diagnostic_test)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Leiden University Medical Center
Primary completion
Mar 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
To Identify the Accuracy of Routine CTPA for the Distinction of CTEPH From Acute PE.
70; 70

Summary

In this study the investigators will evaluate whether more careful reading (than the current standard) of routine computerised tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) performed in the clinical work-up of suspected (pulmonary embolism (PE) will differentiate patients with acute PE from those with more chronic or acute on chronic PE, which could be indicative of the presence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)"

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients after an acute PE diagnosed with CTEPH according to current guidelines, patients after an acute PE in whom CTEPH is excluded by follow-up echocardiography
  • availability of the CTPA scan of the initial PE episode

Exclusion Criteria

  • CTEPH diagnosis based on other test results than a RHC
  • Patients who did not receive anticoagulation after PE diagnosis
  • Patients under the age of 18 years old
  • Patients in the control group with a follow-up duration of less than 2 years after the index PE episode
  • Use of a CTPA scanner with less than 32-detector rows
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03083093). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search