Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=92 Single-blind Treatment

Epidural Neuroplasty for the Treatment of Herniated Lumbar Disk

Herniated Lumbar Disc

Enrolled (actual)
92
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Pain Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale — 5.63; 5.92 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Mechanical epidural neuroplasty (Device); Transforaminal epidural compound betamethasone injection (Drug); Caudal epidural compound betamethasone injection (Drug); Epidural hyaluronidase injection (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
yan lu
Primary completion
Feb 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Pain Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale
2.81; 4.06
PRIMARY
Pain Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale
2.81; 4.06
PRIMARY
Pain Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale
2.81; 4.06
PRIMARY
Pain Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale
2.81; 4.06
SECONDARY
Functional Status Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index
30.52; 46.39
SECONDARY
Functional Status Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index
30.52; 46.39
SECONDARY
Functional Status Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index
30.52; 46.39
SECONDARY
Functional Status Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index
30.52; 46.39

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether epidural neuroplasty has better efficacy than epidural steroid injection for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • clinical diagnosis of herniated lumbar disc
  • written informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria

  • Lumbar instability
  • Piriformis syndrome
  • Diabetes mellitus with uncontrolled blood glucose
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • Impaired function of cauda equina
  • Severe sacral hiatus variation
  • Interspinous ligament inflammation
  • Myofascitis on lumbar and legs
  • The third lumbar transverse process syndrome
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03101033). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search