Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=75 Health Services Research

Motivational Interview Intervention to Help Patients Formulate Their Goals for Medical Care in the Emergency Department

Emergency Service, Hospital · Motivational Interviewing · Advance Care Planning

Enrolled (actual)
75
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Patients Who Found the Intervention Acceptable and Provided Suggestions for Improvement — 48 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Brief motivational interview intervention (Behavioral)
Age
Older Adult · 65+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Primary completion
May 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Patients Who Found the Intervention Acceptable and Provided Suggestions for Improvement
48
SECONDARY
Acceptability of the Intervention by Administering Clinicians.
7
SECONDARY
Patient's Quality of Life
3.69; 3.72; 3.70; 3.00; 4.00; 4.40
SECONDARY
Advance Care Planning Engagement Behavior
3.8; 4.3
SECONDARY
Patient Empowerment
SECONDARY
Patient Distress
0.66; 0.70; 0.86; 0.33

Summary

Test the acceptability and feasibility of a brief motivational interview intervention to facilitate advance care planning (ACP) conversations for older adults with serious co-morbid illness being discharged from the emergency department (ED). The investigators will interview the participants to understand their perception of the intervention and collect patient-reported outcomes data after leaving the ED.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ≥65 years of age
  • English-speaking
  • Capacity to consent
  • AND ≥1 Serious illness (New York Heart Association stage 3 or 4 heart failure, oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive lung disease, chronic kidney disease on dialysis, and metastatic cancer.) OR determined by the emergency department provider that the patient has a high likelihood of death in the next 12 months ("I would not be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months.").

Exclusion Criteria

  • Acute physical or emotional distress
  • Determined by emergency department provider not to be appropriate
  • Clearly documented goals for medical care already exists (e.g. medical order for life sustaining treatment - MOLST).
  • Already enrolled in this study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03208530). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search