Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=39 Randomized Other

A Comparison of Different Ventilation Strategies in Infants Using the PLMA™

Ventilation

Enrolled (actual)
39
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Values of End-tidal Carbon Dioxide and Tidal Volume Compared Between the Spontaneous Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation Groups. — 4.5; 7; 51.8; 49 cc/kg

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Spontaneous ventilation (Other); Pressure support ventilation (Device); Pressure control ventilation (Device)
Age
Pediatric · 0+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Wake Forest University
Primary completion
Jul 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Values of End-tidal Carbon Dioxide and Tidal Volume Compared Between the Spontaneous Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation Groups.
4.5; 7; 51.8; 49
PRIMARY
Mean Values of ETCO2 and TV Compared Between the SV and PCV Groups
51.8; 48.3; 4.5; 7.0
PRIMARY
Mean Values of ETCO2 and TV Compared Between the PSV and PCV Groups
49.0; 48.3; 7.0; 7.0
SECONDARY
Mean Values of Respiratory Rates Between Spontaneous Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation Groups.
32.2; 25.1
SECONDARY
Mean Values of Respiratory Rate Compared Between the Spontaneous Ventilation and Pressure Control Ventilation Groups.
32.2; 22.3
SECONDARY
Mean Values of Respiratory Rate Compared Between Pressure Support Ventilation and Pressure Control Ventilation Groups.
25.1; 22.3

Summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare difference between breathing by oneself or with the partial help from an anesthesia machine in infants under general anesthesia. Hypothesis: Infants undergoing general anesthesia with a PLMA™ will be better ventilated (improved breathing) with the help of the breathing machine versus breathing on their own.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical classification of 1 or 2
  • Outpatient surgical procedures
  • Surgical procedure anticipated to be < 90 minutes
  • Subject age of 1 - 11 months (inclusive)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inpatient- Such individuals may have underlying disease processes which puts them at an increased risk under general anesthesia for hypoventilation
  • ASA physical classification of 3, 4 or E
  • Premature infants or infants < 44 weeks post-conceptual age
  • Risk of aspiration- Intubation with an endotracheal tube may be required for general anesthesia.
  • Patients with malignant hyperthermia or family history of malignant hyperthermia- Administration of inhalational agents for general anesthesia is contraindicated.
  • Patients with tracheostomies- The individual's airway is already established and PLMA™ placement is not required.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03235817). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search