Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=3,962 Randomized Health Services Research

Evaluating Evidence-Based Quality Improvement of Comprehensive Women's Health Care Implementation in Low-Performing VAs

Comprehensive Care

Enrolled (actual)
3,962
Serious AEs
Results posted
Aug 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Gender-sensitive Care Environment — 4.2; 3.3; 1.6; 1.4 score on a scale — p=0.623

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Primary completion
Sep 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Gender-sensitive Care Environment
4.2; 3.3; 3.2; 2.8 0.678
PRIMARY
Gender-sensitive Care Environment
4.2; 3.3; 3.2; 2.8 0.678
PRIMARY
Gender Awareness
3.66; 3.63; 3.64; 3.74 0.29
PRIMARY
Gender Awareness
3.66; 3.63; 3.64; 3.74 0.29
PRIMARY
Quality Improvement Experience
29; 70; 17; 46; 17; 29 0.22
PRIMARY
Quality Improvement Experience
29; 70; 17; 46; 17; 29 0.22
SECONDARY
Gender-specific Preventive Care Delivery
87.5; 87.2; 84.6; 85.8 0.61
SECONDARY
Gender-specific Preventive Care Delivery
87.5; 87.2; 84.6; 85.8 0.61
SECONDARY
Accessibility of Care
46.7; 43.0; 42.7; 42.3 0.708
SECONDARY
Accessibility of Care
46.7; 43.0; 42.7; 42.3 0.708
SECONDARY
Coordination of Care
53.0; 54.7; 51.4; 51.2 0.922
SECONDARY
Coordination of Care
53.0; 54.7; 51.4; 51.2 0.922
SECONDARY
Gender-neutral Guideline-concordant Preventive Care Receipt
78.8; 78.6; 75.9; 75.0 0.51
SECONDARY
Gender-neutral Guideline-concordant Preventive Care Receipt
78.8; 78.6; 75.9; 75.0 0.51
SECONDARY
Assignment to a Designated Women's Health Provider or a Women's Health Primary Care Teams, Using Patient Aligned Care Teams Compass
65.8; 68.7; 78.6; 73.1 0.335
SECONDARY
Assignment to a Designated Women's Health Provider or a Women's Health Primary Care Teams, Using Patient Aligned Care Teams Compass
65.8; 68.7; 78.6; 73.1 0.335
SECONDARY
Provider Rating
65.9; 63.6; 59.7; 57.5 0.991
SECONDARY
Provider Rating
65.9; 63.6; 59.7; 57.5 0.991

Summary

Gaps in delivery of gender-sensitive comprehensive care have resulted in disparities in quality and patient experience among women seen in VA. VA policy action providing guidance on delivery of comprehensive healthcare services for women Veterans was disseminated nationally in 2010, followed by annual assessments and site visits evaluating local VA efforts. While substantial inroads have been made, policy implementation, even when leveraged by field-based women's health leaders, has not been uniformly successful in achieving delivery of comprehensive care by designated providers in gender-sensitive care environments that ensure women's privacy, dignity and safety, all tenets of the original guidance and the updated directive (2017). Building on prior effectiveness of an evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) approach to tailoring VA's medical home model -- Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) -- to the needs of women Veterans, VA leaders in women's health adopted EBQI to help low-performing VAs systematically improve services. The objectives of the resulting Partnered Evaluation Initiative (PEI) funded by VA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative and VA Office of Women's Health were: 1. To evaluate barriers and facilitators to achieving delivery of comprehensive women's health care in the identified low-performing VAs; 2. To evaluate effectiveness of EBQI in supporting low-performing VA facilities achieve improved organizational features, provider/staff attitudes, quality of care, and patient experiences among women Veteran patients; and, 3. To evaluate contextual factors, local implementation processes, and organizational changes in the participating facilities over time.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Unit of randomization: VA healthcare facilities (VA medical center or community-based outpatient clinic)
  • Subset of VA healthcare facilities identified as low-performing on the basis of composites of access/wait times, gender disparities in quality, e.g.:
  • depression screening
  • diabetic blood sugar control
  • Presence/absence of VA-required structural facets of care, e.g.:
  • designated women's health providers
  • mammography coordinator
  • gynecology access
  • Women Veteran Program Manager (WVPM)
  • 3:1 staffing ratio for PACT teamlets

Key Stakeholder Inclusion Criteria (qualitative interviews):

  • Veteran Integrated Service Network (VISN) level leader (Director or Chief Medical Officer)
  • VISN level WVPM Lead, VISN level primary care director, VISN level QI/system redesign lead)
  • VA facility leader (Director or other member of senior leadership)
  • Chief of Staff
  • primary care director
  • women's health medical director
  • WVPM
  • local EBQI champion
  • other key personnel

Provider/Staff Survey Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary care providers (medical doctor [MD], doctor of osteopathy [DO], nurse practitioner [NP], physician assistant [PA]) delivering primary care in general primary care and/or women's health clinics
  • PACT teamlet members (registered nurse [RN] care managers, licensed vocational nurse/licensed practical nurse [LVN/LPN]/health technicians, and clerks)
  • larger PACT team members, e.g.:
  • social workers
  • dieticians
  • health coaches
  • integrated mental health

Exclusion Criteria

  • Facility-level exclusion: Facilities not identified in the initial sample of VA facilities (sample not renewed over time).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03238417). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search