N/A
N=201
Cognitive Recovery With Cannabis Abstinence Among High School-Aged Adolescents
Cannabis Use · Cognitive Change · Adolescent Behavior
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03276221 ↗Enrolled (actual)
201
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Difference in the Total Number of Errors From Paired Associates Learning (PAL) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 — 5.6; 6.2; 5.9 score on a scale — p=0.215
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Abstinence (Behavioral)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult · 10+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Primary completion
- Nov 2022
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Total Number of Errors From Paired Associates Learning (PAL) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
5.6; 6.2; 5.9 | 0.215 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in First Attempt Memory Score From Paired Associates Learning (PAL) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
16.2; 15.8; 16.1 | 0.495 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in Forward Span Length From Spatial Span (SSP) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
7.6; 7.4; 7.6 | 0.050 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in Reverse Span Length From Spatial Span (SSP) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
6.9; 7; 6.9 | 0.532 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Total Number Correct in the Immediate Recall Measure From the Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
7.3; 7.3; 7.7 | 0.226 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Total Number Correct in the Delayed Recall Measure From the Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
6.5; 6.5; 7.2 | 0.369 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Total Number Correct in the Immediate Recognition Condition From the Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
32.3; 32.4; 31.9 | 0.647 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Total Number Correct in the Delayed Recognition Condition From the Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
30.5; 30.9; 30.3 | 0.511 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Total Number Incorrect From the Multitasking Test (MTT) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
7.1; 8.5; 9.1 | 0.312 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Response Latency From the Multitasking Test (MTT) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
474; 468; 482 | 0.836 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Incongruency Cost From the Multitasking Test (MTT) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
37; 40; 43 | 0.898 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Multitasking Cost From the Multitasking Test (MTT) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
96; 71; 81 | 0.068 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in Number of Problems Correctly Solved on the First Choice From the One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (OTS) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
12.2; 11.5; 11.5 | 0.150 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Latency to First Correct Choice From the One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (OTS) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
7036; 6690; 6851 | 0.525 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in Stop Signal Reaction Time From Stop Signal Task (SST) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
210; 219; 222 | 0.038 sig |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Total Number of Between Errors From the Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
3.6; 4.6; 5.5 | 0.576 |
| PRIMARY Mean Difference in the Participant's Strategy for 6-8 Box Conditions From the Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
5.4; 5.7; 6.1 | 0.296 |
| SECONDARY Mean Difference in the Measure of Discriminability - A' From the Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
0.94; 0.93; 0.92 | 0.650 |
| SECONDARY Mean Difference in the Reponse Latency for Hits From the Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP) Module Averaged Over Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 |
422; 428; 428 | 0.223 |
Summary
This study will use a randomized controlled design to test whether 30 days of cannabis abstinence, compared to 30 days of monitoring, is associated with improvements in cognitive functioning. Non-using controls will also be enrolled to determine the clinical significance of any cognitive improvements with abstinence.
Eligibility Criteria
General Inclusion Criteria for School-Aged Study Component:
- Male and female adolescents from the Boston area who are between the ages of 10 and 19 (inclusive);
- Have a parent or legal guardian who is able and willing to provide written informed consent for the active study phase (if under the age of 18);
- Competent and willing to provide written informed assent for the active study phase (if under the age of 18);
- Competent and able to provide written informed consent (if age 18 or older)
- Able to communicate in English language
- Able to commit to 9 study visits in approximately 60 days
- No severe developmental delays (including, but not limited to, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability, and Down Syndrome)
- Able to safely participate in the protocol and appropriate for outpatient level of care
Cannabis-Using Group Inclusion Criteria:
- Use of cannabis at least once per week on most weeks
- Cannabis use reported within 7 days of both baseline visits
- No immediate plan to discontinue cannabis use
Non-Using Group Inclusion Criteria:
- Use of cannabis less than 5 times in lifetime
- No cannabis use in the past year
- No cannabis use before age 16
Exclusion Criteria for School-Aged Study Component
- Passive consent for initial school-wide assessment withdrawn by parent or legal guardian or written parental consent not provided prior to screening
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03276221). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.