Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=144 Randomized Prevention

Joyful Parenting Pilot Project RCT Study

Mental Well-being · Happiness

Enrolled (actual)
144
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Sharing (Praise), Mind (Appreciation) and Enjoyment (SME) Related Behaviours — 11.49; 11.34; 12.23; 11.05 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Joyful Parenting Intervention (Behavioral)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
Primary completion
Jun 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Sharing (Praise), Mind (Appreciation) and Enjoyment (SME) Related Behaviours
11.49; 11.34; 12.23; 11.05; 13.09; 12.34
SECONDARY
Changes in Subjective Happiness From Baseline to Three-month After Baseline
4.47; 4.52; 5.03; 4.54; 5.12; 4.64
SECONDARY
Changes in Mental Well-being From Baseline to Three-month After Baseline
24.82; 23.82; 25.81; 24.67; 27.32; 24.81
SECONDARY
Changes in Family Relationship From Baseline to Three-month After Baseline
20.71; 20.85; 22.36; 20.73; 23.06; 20.34
SECONDARY
Changes in Personal and Family Health From Baseline to Three-month After Baseline
6.15; 6.10; 6.99; 6.18; 7.29; 6.32
SECONDARY
Changes in Personal and Family Happiness From Baseline to Three-month After Baseline
6.15; 6.15; 6.97; 6.45; 7.25; 6.37
SECONDARY
Changes in Family Harmony From Baseline to Three-month After Baseline
6.23; 6.49; 7.20; 6.80; 7.39; 6.63
SECONDARY
Changes in Knowledge and Perception of Mixed Anxiety and Depressive Disorders
4.85; 5.30; 7.33; 4.95; 7.23; 5.50
SECONDARY
Satisfaction Towards Joyful Parenting Intervention Programme
8.47; 8.48; 8.80

Summary

Aims: To enhance mental well-being of adolescents, adults and their families by creating a positive, happy and joyful environment in the community. Targets: Parents aged 12-59 and their family members in Hong Kong. Methods: Joyful Parenting Pilot Project will adopt the public health and family-focused approach, under the brand name of "Joyful@HK Campaign". Evidence-based and Evidence Generating approach with vigorous study design, both qualitative (e.g. focus groups) and quantitative (e.g. randomised controlled trial), will be used to evaluate the overall programme effectiveness including follow-up of at least one month ("best science"). To ensure the practicability and sustainability of the CBEP, we will engage community partners with strong track records of "best practice" to design, plan, and implement the intervention. This project will use innovative and integrated positive psychology and public health theories and methods to plan brief, simple, and cost-effective intervention. Significance: By using "best science" in the design and evaluation of intervention programme, and the "best practice" of the partners' skills, experience and strong connection with service targets in the community, the intervention, if proven to be effective, for promoting sharing, mind and enjoyment and enhancing mental wellbeing can be further developed and widely disseminated to and adopted by the practitioners in the health and social service sectors for replication and improvement to benefit the whole population.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Parents (major subjects):
  • Parents aged 18-59 (including single parents)
  • Chinese speaking
  • Able to complete questionnaires/ focus groups
  • Their family members:
  • Family members of those parents who have already participated in the Joyful Parenting Pilot Project (Their family members could be children/ adolescents)
  • Chinese speaking
  • Able to complete questionnaires/ focus groups
  • Community partners
  • Staff of Integrated Family Service Units, under Hong Kong Family Welfare Society in partnership with HKU research team, who organize, plan or implement the project
  • Adults aged 18 or above
  • Chinese speaking
  • Able to complete questionnaires/ individual in-depth interviews

Exclusion Criteria

  • Those who cannot read Chinese
  • Those who suffered from severe mental illness
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03282071). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search