Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=132 Randomized Double-blind Health Services Research

Involving Family to Improve Communication in Breast Cancer Care

Active Breast Cancer Treatment

Enrolled (actual)
132
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Between-group Differences in Patient Complete Illness Understanding at 9-months — 42; 38; 21; 17 Participants — p=0.264

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Checklist, MyChart, OpenNotes (Other); Usual Care (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Primary completion
Jul 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Between-group Differences in Patient Complete Illness Understanding at 9-months
42; 38; 21; 17 0.264
PRIMARY
Between-group Differences in Mean Patient Satisfaction With Cancer Care at 9-months
16.9; 15.4 0.555
PRIMARY
Between-group Differences in Patient Anxiety at 9-months
7; 8; 56; 47 0.619
PRIMARY
Between-group Differences in Care Partner Complete Illness Understanding at 9-months
44; 39; 19; 16 0.532
PRIMARY
Between-group Differences in Care Partner Satisfaction With Cancer Care at 9-months
15.7; 15.4 0.108
PRIMARY
Between-group Differences in Care Partner Anxiety at 9-months
8; 10; 55; 45 0.405
SECONDARY
Between-group Differences in Patient Quality of Communication at 9-months
89.8; 88.0 0.412
SECONDARY
Between-group Differences in Care Partner Quality of Communication at 9-months
90.3; 86.2 0.872

Summary

This study evaluates a multi-component communication intervention in the outpatient setting to strengthen communication among patients being actively treated for breast cancer and their support network of family members and friends. The intervention comprises: 1.) a patient-family agenda-setting checklist completed immediately before a regularly scheduled oncology visit, 2.) facilitated registration for the patient portal (for patient and family member, as desired by the patient), and 3.) education (as relevant) on access to clinician electronic visit notes. The study team will conduct a two-group randomized trial to examine feasibility of the protocol and to compare quality of communication with oncology providers, understanding of patient's cancer, confidence in managing patient's care and satisfaction with cancer care between patient-companion dyads who are in the intervention group (n=60) and patient-companion dyads who receive usual medical oncology care (n=60).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Medical oncology patient: Established patient of participating medical oncologist greater than 18 years of age, have a diagnosis of early stage or advanced breast cancer, are receiving active systemic therapy (in the form of IV adjuvant systemic therapy if early stage), are English speaking, able to provide informed consent themselves, and identify a family member who they would like to include in their care.
  • Care partner: Family member (e.g. spouse, adult child, parent, adult sibling or other relative) or unpaid friend who regularly accompanies patient to medical oncology visits.
  • Medical oncology provider: Practicing medical oncology provider at a participating clinic who provides care to patients with breast cancer.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Medical oncology patients: Younger than 18 years, pregnant, not being treated for breast cancer, do not attend medical oncology visits with family member or unpaid friend or unwilling for their family member or unpaid friend to be contacted.
  • Care partner: Paid non-family member who accompanies patient to visits.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03283553). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search