Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=38 Randomized Treatment

To Compare Blephapad Combo vs Standard Treatment for Eyelid Cleansing in Bilateral Posterior Blepharitis

Bilateral Blepharitis (Disorder)

Enrolled (actual)
38
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage Change of the Total Score of the Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) — -38.5; -29.9 percentage of change in the total score

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Blephapad Combo (Combination_product); Standard treatment (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 40+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
NTC srl
Primary completion
Feb 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage Change of the Total Score of the Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD)
-38.5; -29.9
SECONDARY
Change of the Total Score of the Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Improved vs Not Improved)
16; 15; 1; 2; 1; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Patients Preferring the Standard or the Study Treatment (i.e. Answers to a Specific Question on Patient Preference: Study Drug vs. Standard Treatment)
12; 5 0.071

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of, and patient satisfaction with Blephapad Combo in the treatment of posterior blepharitis.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age > 40 years
  • Male or female
  • Diagnosis of bilateral posterior blepharitis
  • Written informed consent of patient

Exclusion Criteria

  • Treatment with topical ophthalmic drugs (artificial tears allowed)
  • Ocular surgery in the previous 6 months
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Cognitive impairment that could affect evaluation of preferences
  • Participation in other clinical studies in the last month
  • Hypersensitivity to one or more components of the study products
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03301844). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search