Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=34 Randomized Treatment

Patient Outcomes and Gingival Blood Flow Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry Following the Use of Episil on Free Gingival Graft Donor Sites

Pain From Free Gingival Graft
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03350724 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
34
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale — 12; 6 Participants — p=0.039

Summary

The hypothesis for the present study is that patient-based outcomes and gingival blood flow will be more favorable for the free gingival graft (FGG) donor sites being covered by the test wound dressing material episil compared to the control dressing.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale
17; 17 0.999
PRIMARY
Postoperative Pain as Assessed by the Number of Analgesic Pills Taken Each Day
0; 0 0.357
SECONDARY
Gingival Blood Flow as Measured Laser Doppler Flometry (LDF)
-34.7; 5.3 0.22
SECONDARY
Gingival Blood Flow as Measured Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF)
151.2; 85.3 0.375
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Re-epithelialization of the FGG Donor Site as Indicated by a Non-invasive Peroxide Test
6; 5

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patient of record at UTHealth School of Dentistry Houston Texas
  • signed treatment plan for a FGG
  • the ability to provide research informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • any allergies to any of the ingredients in episil including allergies to peanuts, soy or peppermint oil
  • smokers
  • pregnant or breast feeding women
  • inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03350724). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search