N/A
N=34
Patient Outcomes and Gingival Blood Flow Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry Following the Use of Episil on Free Gingival Graft Donor Sites
Pain From Free Gingival Graft
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03350724 ↗Enrolled (actual)
34
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale — 12; 6 Participants — p=0.039
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- episil wound dressing (Device); PeriAcryl90 wound dressing (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Primary completion
- May 2017
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale |
17; 17 | 0.999 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale |
17; 17 | 0.999 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale |
17; 17 | 0.999 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale |
17; 17 | 0.999 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale |
17; 17 | 0.999 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale |
17; 17 | 0.999 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale |
17; 17 | 0.999 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by Number of Participants With a Score of 0-3 (no to Minimal Pain) on a Visual Analog Scale |
17; 17 | 0.999 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by the Number of Analgesic Pills Taken Each Day |
0; 0 | 0.357 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by the Number of Analgesic Pills Taken Each Day |
0; 0 | 0.357 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by the Number of Analgesic Pills Taken Each Day |
0; 0 | 0.357 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by the Number of Analgesic Pills Taken Each Day |
0; 0 | 0.357 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by the Number of Analgesic Pills Taken Each Day |
0; 0 | 0.357 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by the Number of Analgesic Pills Taken Each Day |
0; 0 | 0.357 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by the Number of Analgesic Pills Taken Each Day |
0; 0 | 0.357 |
| PRIMARY Postoperative Pain as Assessed by the Number of Analgesic Pills Taken Each Day |
0; 0 | 0.357 |
| SECONDARY Gingival Blood Flow as Measured Laser Doppler Flometry (LDF) |
-34.7; 5.3 | 0.22 |
| SECONDARY Gingival Blood Flow as Measured Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) |
151.2; 85.3 | 0.375 |
| SECONDARY Gingival Blood Flow as Measured Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) |
151.2; 85.3 | 0.375 |
| SECONDARY Gingival Blood Flow as Measured Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) |
151.2; 85.3 | 0.375 |
| SECONDARY Gingival Blood Flow as Measured Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) |
151.2; 85.3 | 0.375 |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Re-epithelialization of the FGG Donor Site as Indicated by a Non-invasive Peroxide Test |
6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Re-epithelialization of the FGG Donor Site as Indicated by a Non-invasive Peroxide Test |
6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Re-epithelialization of the FGG Donor Site as Indicated by a Non-invasive Peroxide Test |
6; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Re-epithelialization of the FGG Donor Site as Indicated by a Non-invasive Peroxide Test |
6; 5 | — |
Summary
The hypothesis for the present study is that patient-based outcomes and gingival blood flow will be more favorable for the free gingival graft (FGG) donor sites being covered by the test wound dressing material episil compared to the control dressing.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- patient of record at UTHealth School of Dentistry Houston Texas
- signed treatment plan for a FGG
- the ability to provide research informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- any allergies to any of the ingredients in episil including allergies to peanuts, soy or peppermint oil
- smokers
- pregnant or breast feeding women
- inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03350724). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.