Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=1,671 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Women

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03354598 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,671
Serious AEs
0.5%
Results posted
Dec 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall Success — 62.6; 36.0 percentage of participants
◆ Published Evidence
Established
42citations · ~14 / year
Sulopenem or Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial.
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus oral ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in adult women

Linked Publications

  • Sulopenem or Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial.
    Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023 · 42 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall Success
62.6; 36.0
PRIMARY
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) Participants With Overall Success
66.8; 78.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Patients With Microbiologic Success
74.1; 49.6

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female patients ≥18 years of age with 24-96 hours of urinary symptoms attributable to a urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Two of the following signs and symptoms of uUTI: urinary frequency, urinary urgency, pain or burning micturition, suprapubic pain
  • A mid-stream urine specimen with:
  • a dipstick analysis positive for nitrite AND
  • evidence of pyuria as defined by either:

i. a dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase ii. at least 10 white blood cells per cubic millimeter on microscopic analysis of unspun urine iii. White blood cell count ≥10 cells/high-powered field in the sediment of a spun urine

  • Has given written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Presence of signs and symptoms suggestive of acute pyelonephritis: fever (temperature > 38°Celsius), chills, costovertebral angle tenderness, flank pain, nausea, and/or vomiting
  • Receipt of antibacterial drug therapy potentially effective as treatment of uUTI within the prior 7 days
  • Concurrent use of non-study treatments that would have a potential effect on outcome evaluations in patients with uUTI
  • Patients with ileal loops or urinary stoma
  • Patients with an indwelling urinary catheter in the previous 30 days
  • Patients with paraplegia
  • Patients who are likely to receive ongoing antibacterial drug prophylaxis after treatment of uUTI (e.g., patients with vesico-ureteral reflux)
  • Any history of trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract
  • Patient's urine culture, if available at study entry, identify more than 2 microorganisms regardless of colony count or patient has a confirmed fungal UTI
  • Patient is receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or had a renal transplant
  • Known history of creatinine clearance <50 mL/min
  • Patients known to have liver disease
  • Patients who are pregnant, or females of child-bearing age unable to take adequate contraceptive precautions
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Patients with history of blood dyscrasias
  • Patients with history of uric acid kidney stones
  • Patients with acute gouty attack
  • Patients on chronic methotrexate therapy
  • Patient known to be immunocompromised
  • Patients with a known history of myasthenia gravis
  • Patients who require concomitant administration of tizanidine or valproic acid
  • Patients with a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to carbapenems, beta-lactams, quinolones or probenecid
  • Patient is considered unlikely to survive the 4-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness including septic shock which is associated with a high risk of mortality
  • History of seizures
  • Use of any other investigational drug in the 30 days prior to the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03354598) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search