Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=674 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Sulopenem Versus Ertapenem for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)

Intra Abdominal Infections

Enrolled (actual)
674
Serious AEs
5.5%
Results posted
Dec 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success — 85.5; 90.2 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Ertapenem (Drug); Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid (Drug); Ciprofloxacin (Drug); Metronidazole (Drug); Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (Drug); Sulopenem (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited
Primary completion
Oct 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success
208; 227
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success
208; 227

Summary

This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin-metronidazole for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient or the patient's legally acceptable representative able to provide a signed written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.
  • Adult patients ≥18 years of age
  • EITHER:

a. Intra-operative/post-operative enrollment with visual confirmation (presence of pus within the abdominal cavity) of an intra-abdominal infection associated with peritonitis including at least 1 of the following diagnosed during the surgical intervention: i. Cholecystitis with gangrenous rupture or perforation or progression of the infection beyond the gallbladder wall ii. Diverticular disease with perforation or abscess iii. Appendiceal perforation or peri-appendiceal abscess iv. Traumatic perforation of the intestines, only if operated on >12 hours after perforation occurs v. Secondary peritonitis (but not spontaneous bacterial peritonitis associated with cirrhosis and chronic ascites) vi. Intra-abdominal abscess (including of liver or spleen provided that there was extension beyond the organ with evidence of intraperitoneal involvement).

OR:

b. Pre-operative enrollment where one of the following surgical procedures are planned within 24 hours prior to the first dose of study drug: i. Open laparotomy, percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess, or laparoscopic surgery.

  • Evidence of systemic inflammatory indicators, with at least one of the following:

i. Fever (defined as body temperature >38°C) or hypothermia with a core body temperature 12,000 cells/mm3) iii. Drop in blood pressure (systolic BP must be 90 bpm) and respiratory rate (>20 breaths/min) v. Hypoxia (oxygen saturation ≤90 percent on room air)

  • Physical findings or symptoms consistent with intra-abdominal infection, with at least one of the following:

i. Abdominal pain and/or tenderness, with or without rebound ii. Localized or diffuse abdominal wall rigidity iii. Abdominal mass iv. Nausea/vomiting v. Altered Mental Status

  • Specimen/s from the surgical intervention were sent for culture.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient diagnosed with traumatic bowel perforation undergoing surgery within 12 hours; perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers undergoing surgery within 24 hours. Other intra-abdominal processes in which the primary etiology was not likely to be infectious.
  • Patient has abdominal wall abscess or bowel obstruction without perforation or ischemic bowel without perforation.
  • Patient has simple cholecystitis or gangrenous cholecystitis without rupture, or simple appendicitis, or acute suppurative cholangitis; or infected necrotizing pancreatitis or pancreatic abscess.
  • Patient whose surgery included staged abdominal repair, or "open abdomen" technique, or marsupialization.
  • Patient known at study entry to have a complicated intra-abdominal infection caused by pathogens resistant to the study antimicrobial agents.
  • Patient needed effective concomitant systemic antibacterials (oral, IV, or intramuscular) or antifungals in addition to those designated in the 2 study groups, except vancomycin, linezolid, or daptomycin if started for known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Enterococcus spp. as per clinical study protocol (CSP).
  • Patient has perinephric infections or an indwelling peritoneal dialysis catheter.
  • Patient has suspected intra-abdominal infections due to fungus, parasites (e.g., amoebic liver abscess), virus, or tuberculosis.
  • Patient has a known history of serious allergy, hypersensitivity or any serious reaction to carbapenem antibiotics, or to other β-lactam antibiotics
  • Patient known to have any of the following laboratory values as defined below:
  • Hematocrit 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN), unless isolated hyperbilirubinemia was directly related to the acute infection or known Gilbert's disease
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3 x ULN values at Screening. Patients with elevations of AST and/or ALT up to 5 x ULN will be el
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03358576). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search