N/A
N=120
Study of PneumRx Endobronchial Coil System in Treatment of Subjects With Severe Emphysema
Emphysema
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03360396 ↗Enrolled (actual)
120
Serious AEs
29.2%
Results posted
Nov 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Percent Change in FEV1 at 6 Months — 12.745; -2.604 percent change from baseline
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Endobronchial Coils (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 35+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Primary completion
- Feb 2020
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percent Change in FEV1 at 6 Months |
12.745; -2.604 | — |
| PRIMARY Absolute Change in SGRQ Score at 6 Months |
-8.561; 2.080 | — |
Summary
This study will look at outcomes between Endobronchial Coil Treatment and Control groups in patients with severe heterogeneous and or homogeneous emphysema.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Read, understood and signed the Informed Consent form
- Meets indications for use per the IFU
- Bilateral heterogeneous and/or homogeneous emphysema
- Post bronchodilator 15% predicted ≤ Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤ 45% predicted
- Post bronchodilator Residual Volume (RV) ≥ 200% predicted
- Post bronchodilator Total Lung Capacity (TLC) >100% pred.
- Post bronchodilator RV/TLC > 55%
- Dyspnea related to hyperinflation scored ≥ 2 on modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale despite optimal medical management
- Receiving optimal drug therapy and medical management according to clinical practice.
- Performing regular physical activity, at least 2 times per week
- Stopped smoking as confirmed by carboxyhemoglobin (CoHB)
- 100m ≤ 6 minute walk distance (6MWD) ≤ 450m
- Deemed eligible per Eligibility Review Committee (ERC)
- if treated in France, subject must be entitled to French social security.
Exclusion Criteria
- Known sensitivity to drugs required for performing bronchoscopy or in whom bronchoscopic procedures are contraindicated
- Evidence of active infection in the lungs
- Hypersensitivity or allergy to nitinol (nickel-titanium) or its constituent metals
- Clinical significant pulmonary fibrosis
- Clinically significant, generalized bronchiectasis
- Clinically significant bleeding disorders
- Patient taking immunosuppressive drugs other than steroids (e.g., for the treatment of cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune disease, or prevention of tissue or organ rejection).
- Primary diagnosis of asthma
- Two (2) or more COPD exacerbations in the prior year, or 1 or more COPD exacerbations in the prior 3 months with indication for hospitalization assessment, according to GOLD 2017 recommendations .
- Predominant small airways disease defined as significant bronchiectasis with sputum production (> 2 tablespoons daily) or significant bronchial wall thickening per High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)
- Percent Low Attenuation Area (%LAA) 8cm or 1/3 of lung volume, or single bullous defect >8 cm) or predominant paraseptal emphysema [defined by numerous large (>1cm) paraseptal defects in the target lobe comprising of >5% of total lung volume].
- Lung pathology of nodule not proven stable or benign
- Radiographic confirmation of atelectasis or other scarring/fibrosis in areas of intended Coil implant
- Use of more than 20 mg/day prednisolone or equivalent dosage of a different corticosteroid
- Severe pulmonary hypertension (Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP) > 50 mm Hg or other signs of Pulmonary Hypertension (PHT) with right ventricular dysfunction)
- Severe hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 55 mmHg on room air) and/or severe hypoxemia (PaO2 30
- Participation in any other clinical Study.
- Subject is pregnant or lactating, or plan to become pregnant within the study timeframe.
- If treated in France, Subject is a "personnel vulnerable" as defined by French Regulation
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03360396). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.