Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=22 Randomized Supportive Care

Music vs. No Music During Cesarean Delivery on Patient Satisfaction

Patient Satisfaction

Enrolled (actual)
22
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Patient Satisfaction — 120; 116 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Music (Other)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Tufts Medical Center
Primary completion
Aug 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Patient Satisfaction
120; 116
SECONDARY
Patient Anxiety
2.5; 2.7
SECONDARY
Hemodynamic Parameter (Mean Arterial Pressure, MAP)
82.2; 80.4

Summary

Several studies have demonstrated that music can improve various outcomes during labor and delivery. However, many of these studies didn't measure satisfaction rate accurately. This study aim to assess patient satisfaction in the setting of music or no music during the cesarean delivery. The study will be conducted in the labor and delivery unit and the expected number to enroll and complete the study is 22.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age: 18-50 years old
  • Scheduled for elective cesarean delivery
  • Nulliparity
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Full term fetus (≥37.0 weeks gestational age)
  • Healthy fetus (no known congenital diseases at the time of surgery)
  • Requesting neuraxial anesthesia for the procedure
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal
  • Prior history of extensive abdominal surgery
  • Active labor
  • Contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Infection at the skin site of epidural placement
  • Increased intracranial pressure
  • Untreated hemodynamic instability
  • Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (a.k.a. amide or ester allergy)
  • Patients with impaired hearing
  • Patient on anti-anxiolytic medication
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03412019). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search