Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=684 Randomized Treatment

A Study of Tislelizumab Versus Sorafenib in Participants With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Enrolled (actual)
684
Serious AEs
15.0%
Results posted
Oct 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Safety Run-in Sub-study: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) — 8; 1 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Tislelizumab (Drug); Sorafenib (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
BeiGene
Primary completion
Jul 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Safety Run-in Sub-study: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
8; 1
PRIMARY
Safety Run-in Sub-study: Serum Concentration of Tislelizumab
63.21; 53.04; 42.06; 32.61; 23.74; 27.17
PRIMARY
Main Study: Overall Survival (OS)
15.9; 14.1 0.0398 sig
SECONDARY
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)
14.3; 5.4 0.0003 sig
SECONDARY
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator
20; 15.5; 5.7 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by BIRC
2.1; 3.4 0.1364
SECONDARY
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by the Investigator
2.1; 2.1; 4.0 0.2622
SECONDARY
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by BIRC
36.1; 11.0
SECONDARY
Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by the Investigator
NA; 25.2; 13.8
SECONDARY
Time to Progression (TTP) Assessed by BIRC
2.2; 4.1 0.0859
SECONDARY
Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the Investigator
2.1; 4.1 0.1182
SECONDARY
Safety Run-in Sub-study: Overall Survival
29.7
SECONDARY
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by BIRC
44.2; 50.3
SECONDARY
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by the Investigator
44.2; 52.4
SECONDARY
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Assessed by BIRC
25.4; 24.4
SECONDARY
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Assessed by the Investigator
25.7; 28.9
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Questions (EORTC QLQ HCC 18) Index Score at Cycle 4
1.6; 3.9 0.0033 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the European EORTC QLQ HCC 18 Index Score at Cycle 6
2.2; 4.9 0.0096 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life Score at Cycle 4
-0.7; -5.1 0.0037 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life Score at Cycle 6
-0.9; -5.9 0.0022 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions, 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Cycle 4
-0.4; -4.3
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D-5L VAS at Cycle 6
-0.2; -5.4
SECONDARY
Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
325; 324; 104; 91
SECONDARY
Safety Run-in Sub-study: Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-tislelizumab Antibodies
1; 0

Summary

This Phase 3 study was a global, multicenter trial that randomly assigned participants to either tislelizumab or sorafenib as a first-line treatment for adults with advanced liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma) that could not be surgically removed. Before enrolling Japanese participants in the main Phase 3 study, a preliminary assessment of safety and tolerability (the Safety Run-In Sub-study) was conducted in Japan.

Eligibility Criteria

Safety Run-In Sub-study Eligibility Criteria: The study included adult Japanese participants (≥ 20 years) with histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C or B. Eligible participants had either received, were ineligible for, or declined standard treatment. Additional requirements were a Child-Pugh A classification within 7 days before enrollment, at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score of ≤ 1.

Main Study Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC
  • Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage B or C disease not amenable to or progressing after loco-regional therapy and not amenable to a curative treatment approach
  • No prior systemic therapy for HCC (with the exception of HCC participants enrolled in the safety run-in substudy [Japan only])
  • Measurable disease
  • Child-Pugh score A
  • Easter Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤ 1
  • Adequate organ function

Main Study Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known fibrolamellar HCC, sarcomatoid HCC, or mixed cholangiocarcinoma and HCC histology
  • Tumor thrombus involving main trunk of portal vein or inferior vena cava
  • Loco-regional therapy to the liver within 28 days before randomization
  • Clinical evidence of portal hypertension with bleeding esophageal or gastric varices at Screening, or within 6 months before randomization
  • Bleeding or thrombotic disorder or any prescribed anticoagulant requiring therapeutic international normalized ratio monitoring (eg, warfarin or similar agents) at Screening, or within 6 months before randomization/enrollment
  • Presence at Screening of active immune deficiency or autoimmune disease and/or prior history of any immune deficiency or autoimmune disease that may relapse
  • Participant with any condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (> 10 mg daily of prednisone or equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medication within 14 days before randomization
  • History of interstitial lung disease or non-infectious pneumonitis, unless induced by radiation therapy
  • QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) (corrected by Fridericia's method) > 450 msec at Screening

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03412773). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search