Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=280 Randomized Other

Communication Coaching to Improve Patient and Clinician Satisfaction in Cardiology Encounters

Improved Communication Between Clinician and Patient

Enrolled (actual)
280
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Cardiologist Behavior as Measured by WISER (Writing, Immersive Experiences, Speaking, Ethical Communication, and Research) Assessment. — 11.95; 13.15 Number of Reflective Statements

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Communication Intervention (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Duke University
Primary completion
Nov 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Cardiologist Behavior as Measured by WISER (Writing, Immersive Experiences, Speaking, Ethical Communication, and Research) Assessment.
3.41; 3.28
PRIMARY
Cardiologist Behavior as Measured by WISER (Writing, Immersive Experiences, Speaking, Ethical Communication, and Research) Assessment.
3.41; 3.28
PRIMARY
Ratio of Empathic Responses to Empathic Opportunities
0.20; 0.50
SECONDARY
Global Ratings of Communication as Measured by WISER (Writing, Immersive Experiences, Speaking, Ethical Communication, and Research) Assessment
3.8; 3.8; 2.9; 3.3; 4.0; 4.2

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of a clinician communication coaching intervention versus control on an objective measure of the quality of communication (primary outcome) and patients' perceptions of the quality of patient-centered care (secondary outcome), both overall and within Black and White patients.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients must be 18 years or older
  • Must be able to read
  • Must speak English
  • Capable of providing informed consent
  • Must be receiving continuity care from and enrolled clinician

Exclusion Criteria

  • Currently hospitalized
  • Awaiting heart transplant
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03464110). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search