Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=130 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy in Morbidly Obese Patients

Morbid Obesity

Enrolled (actual)
130
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Classification of Glottis Visualization — 45; 23; 11; 16 Participants — p=<0.01

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
McGrath videolaryngoscopy (Device); Direct laryngoscopy (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Primary completion
Jun 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Classification of Glottis Visualization
45; 23; 11; 16; 7; 14 <0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Intubation Failure
2; 5 0.08
SECONDARY
Number of Intubation Attempts Among Those With Successful Intubation
61; 56; 3; 2 0.41

Summary

Our goal is to compare conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade with the McGrath videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in very morbidly obese patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Specifically, we propose to test the primary hypotheses that videolaryngoscopy improves visualization of the vocal cords, defined with modified Cormack and Lehane classification, compared to direct laryngoscopy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Elective surgery requiring oral endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia;
  • Anticipated extubation in the operating room;
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3;
  • Age between 18 and 99 years;
  • Body Mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Refusal of participation by attending anesthesiologist;
  • Indicated rapid sequence induction for any reason including, but not limited to high risk of aspiration
  • Indicated fiberoptic awake intubation.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03467048). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search