N/A N=37 Randomized Single-blind Other

Learning Direct Laryngoscopy Using a McGrath Video Laryngoscope as Direct Versus Indirect Laryngoscope

Airway Management · Endotracheal Intubation · Medical Education

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03471975 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Aug 2019

Primary outcome: Primary: Intubation Success Rate — 14; 14 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: direct laryngoscope (Procedure); video laryngoscope (Procedure)
Age: Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex: All
Sponsor: Ajou University School of Medicine
Primary completion: Jul 2018

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Intubation Success Rate	14; 14	—
PRIMARY Time to Intubation	54.6; 56.8	—

Summary

prospective randomised trial to compare the teaching effect for tracheal intubation following training with McGrath video laryngoscope as direct laryngoscope versus training with McGrath video laryngoscope as video laryngoscope

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

medical students who has never experienced intubation

Exclusion Criteria

A person who has previously experienced intubation with Manikin or patients.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03471975). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.