Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=37 Randomized Single-blind Other

Learning Direct Laryngoscopy Using a McGrath Video Laryngoscope as Direct Versus Indirect Laryngoscope

Airway Management · Endotracheal Intubation · Medical Education
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03471975 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
37
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Intubation Success Rate — 14; 14 Participants

Summary

prospective randomised trial to compare the teaching effect for tracheal intubation following training with McGrath video laryngoscope as direct laryngoscope versus training with McGrath video laryngoscope as video laryngoscope

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Intubation Success Rate
14; 14
PRIMARY
Time to Intubation
54.6; 56.8

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • medical students who has never experienced intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • A person who has previously experienced intubation with Manikin or patients.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03471975). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search