Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=132 Randomized Screening

Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography vs. MRI for Breast Cancer Screening

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03482557 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
132
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Area Under the Curve for Cancer Detection Rates of CESM Compared With Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening — 0.91; .91 Probability of malignancy

Summary

This research study is evaluating whether contrast enhanced mammography can be used as an alternative to breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for cancer screening

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Area Under the Curve for Cancer Detection Rates of CESM Compared With Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening
0.91; .91
SECONDARY
Area Under the Curve for Cancer Detection Rates of CESM Compared With Abbreviated Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening
.906; .894
SECONDARY
Area Under the Curve for Cancer Detection Rates of CESM Compared With Conventional 2d Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening
.906; .788

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • CESM and MRI exam performed within 3 months of one another.
  • CESM and breast MRI exams must be performed as part of imaging work-up based on a screening exam of any type (mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound, and MRI)
  • CESM studies will include at least four low energy and four recombined images (LCC, LMLO, RCC, RMLO).
  • MRI exams will include at least fluid sensitive sequence, multi-phase T1-weighted

Exclusion Criteria

  • Imaging sets with implants.
  • Imaging sets in which a biopsy or surgical intervention was performed since the most recent screening exam, prior to acquisition of the study MRI or CESM.
  • Imaging sets in which a biopsy was recommended, but biopsy was not performed and 2 year imaging follow-up is not available
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03482557). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search