Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=151 Other

Evaluating the Safety of PregSense™ and Compare Its Performance to CTG in Prenatal Monitoring of Pregnant Subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03504189 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
151
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Fetal Heart Rate — 140.3; 140.4 bpm

Summary

This clinical study will evaluate the safety of PregSense™ and Comparative Performance of PregSense™ versus CTG in Prenatal Monitoring of Pregnant subjects.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Fetal Heart Rate
140.3; 140.4
PRIMARY
Maternal Heart Rate
89.3; 89.1
SECONDARY
Uterine Contractions

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female age between 18-50
  • Gestational age > 32 + 0 weeks
  • Singleton gestation
  • Ability to understand and sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • BMI (Body Mass Index) ≥ 45 and ≤15 prior pregnancy
  • Multiple gestation
  • Uncontrolled Hypertension
  • Fetal Anomaly
  • Subjects with skin problems in the abdominal area (such as flesh wounds, cuts in the skin, skin rashes, etc.)
  • Subjects with implanted electronic devices (pacemaker, defibrillator, etc.)
  • Subjects who, in the judgement of the investigator, are likely to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03504189). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search