Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 1 N=40 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Effect of Number of Remote Limb Ischemic Conditioning Cycles on Learning Enhancement

Healthy, Young Adults

Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Balance Score — 9.9; 11.5; 7.0; 11.3 seconds — p=0.172

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Interventions
RLIC - 5 cycles (Behavioral); RLIC - 4 Cycles (Behavioral); RLIC - 3 Cycles (Behavioral); Sham conditioning (Behavioral); Balance training (Behavioral); Arm training (Behavioral); Sequence production training (Behavioral)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Primary completion
Feb 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Balance Score
9.9; 11.5; 7.0; 11.3 0.172
PRIMARY
Cup Stacking Score
-22.2; -14.9; -11.9; -10.1 0.169
PRIMARY
Discrete Sequence Production Task Score
-3.1; -2.9; -2.6; -2.9 0.501

Summary

The purpose of this research study is to determine the effect of number of remote limb ischemic conditioning (RLIC) cycles on enhancing learning in neurologically intact young adults.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Between the age of 18 and 40 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of neurological condition (i.e. stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease), ADD, ADHD, balance impairment, or vestibular disorder
  • History of sleep apnea
  • History of lower extremity condition, injury, or surgery which could compromise performance on motor training task
  • Any extremity soft tissue, orthopedic, or vascular injury (i.e. peripheral vascular disease) which may contraindicate RLIC
  • Any cognitive, sensory, or communication problem that would prevent completion of the study
  • Current intensive weight lifting or interval training exercise
  • Current substance abuse or dependence
  • Current use of medication with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors.
  • Unwillingness to travel for all study visits
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03512041). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search