Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=123 Treatment

A Study to Evaluate Abicipar Pegol for Safety and Treatment Effect in Participants With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

Macular Degeneration

Enrolled (actual)
123
Serious AEs
13.0%
Results posted
Aug 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With Stable Vision — 97.6 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Abicipar pegol (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Allergan
Primary completion
Feb 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With Stable Vision
97.6
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the Study Eye
-82.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Loss of 15 or Less EDTRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye
0.9
SECONDARY
Change Form Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye
3.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Gain of 15 or More ETDRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye
9.8

Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate abicipar pegol for safety and treatment effects in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female participants, 50 years of age or older at the time of informed consent
  • Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≤ 78 and ≥ 24 letters (20/32 to 20/320 Snellen equivalents, respectively) at Screening and at Baseline (Day 1, prior to treatment) visits in the study eye
  • BCVA of 34 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) or better at Baseline (Day 1, prior to treatment) in the non-study eye

Exclusion Criteria

  • Active periocular, ocular, or intraocular infection at baseline (Day 1) (either eye)
  • Previous or concurrent macular laser treatment (study eye)
  • Cataract or refractive surgery within 3 months prior to baseline (study eye)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03539549). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search