N/A
N=48
Evaluation of a Simulation Based Workshop in an Anesthesia Residency Program
Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Catheter
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03545984 ↗Enrolled (actual)
48
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Composite Staff Evaluation Score (Anesthetist's Nontechnical Skills Global Rating Scale) — 10; 11; 2; 4 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Simulation-based learning (Other); interactive problem based learning (Other)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- The Cleveland Clinic
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Composite Staff Evaluation Score (Anesthetist's Nontechnical Skills Global Rating Scale) |
10; 11; 2; 4; 1; 0 | — |
Summary
The study aim is to determine whether simulation based learning would improve senior anesthesiology residents' patient care performance during the insertion and management of cerebrospinal fluid drainage catheters when compared to interactive problem based learning (PBL) using the Anesthetist's Nontechnical Skills Global rating scale
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Anesthesia residents in their CA-2 or CA-3 year in the vascular rotation who would need to monitor and take care of these systems as well as perform lumbar CSF drainage in the operating room (for thoracic aortic vascular procedures-open and endovascular) or cardiovascular ICU.
Exclusion Criteria
- Anesthesia residents who already were enrolled in the study during their previous vascular rotation
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03545984). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.