Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=159 Randomized Triple-blind Prevention

Tegaderm vs. EyeGard for Eye Protection

Erythema
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03549429 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
159
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Proportion of Participants With Eyelid Erythema — 117; 105 Participants — p=0.03

Summary

This study compares TegadermTM and EyeGard® in general anesthesia.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Proportion of Participants With Eyelid Erythema
117; 105 0.03 sig
SECONDARY
Patient Satisfaction
4.94; 4.91 0.23
SECONDARY
Rate of Corneal Abrasions
0; 0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18
  • Surgeries scheduled for anesthesia of any duration

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any patient that does not consent
  • Any patient who has:
  • Pre-existing eyelid erythema or other eyelid trauma
  • Eyelid piercings
  • Any surgery on the head, brain, neck, teeth, mouth, eyes or face
  • Surgery in the prone position
  • Patients <18 years old
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03549429). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search