N/A
Completed N=159
Tegaderm vs. EyeGard for Eye Protection
Erythema
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03549429 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
159
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Proportion of Participants With Eyelid Erythema — 117; 105 Participants — p=0.03
Summary
This study compares TegadermTM and EyeGard® in general anesthesia.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Proportion of Participants With Eyelid Erythema |
117; 105 | 0.03 sig |
| SECONDARY Patient Satisfaction |
4.94; 4.91 | 0.23 |
| SECONDARY Rate of Corneal Abrasions |
0; 0 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Age ≥ 18
- Surgeries scheduled for anesthesia of any duration
Exclusion Criteria
- Any patient that does not consent
- Any patient who has:
- Pre-existing eyelid erythema or other eyelid trauma
- Eyelid piercings
- Any surgery on the head, brain, neck, teeth, mouth, eyes or face
- Surgery in the prone position
- Patients <18 years old
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03549429). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.