Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=164 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Study of Safety and Efficacy of RVL-1201 in the Treatment of Blepharoptosis

Blepharoptosis

Enrolled (actual)
164
Serious AEs
1.2%
Results posted
Sep 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Change in Number of Points Seen on the Leicester Peripheral Field Test (LPFT) in RVL-1201 Group vs. Vehicle Group — 6.3; 2.1; 7.7; 2.4 Points seen — p=<0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
RVL-1201 (Drug); Vehicle ophthalmic solution (Other)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 9+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
RVL Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Primary completion
Apr 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change in Number of Points Seen on the Leicester Peripheral Field Test (LPFT) in RVL-1201 Group vs. Vehicle Group
6.3; 2.1; 7.7; 2.4 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Marginal Reflex Distance (MRD) in the Study Eye
0.59; 0.20; 0.93; 0.32; 1.05; 0.33 <0.0151 sig

Summary

Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with RVL-1201 compared to placebo for treatment of blepharoptosis. Eligible subjects will be randomized to one of 2 treatment arms.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or Female 9 years of age or older
  • Females must not be pregnant or planning to get pregnant and must use acceptable form of contraception
  • Must be able to self-administer study medication
  • Must be able to understand and sign an informed consent form. For minor subjects, the subject's parent or legal guardian must provide permission by signing an ICF on behalf of the subject and the subject should provide assent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Congenital ptosis
  • Horner syndrome
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Mechanical ptosis
  • Previous ptosis surgery
  • Resting heart rate outside the normal range
  • Hypertension with resting diastolic blood pressure
  • Pregnancy or lactation
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03565887). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search