Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=159

Screening for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Using Self-collected Menstrual Blood

HPV - Anogenital Human Papilloma Virus Infection

Enrolled (actual)
159
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Agreement Between Modified Menstrual Pad and Clinician-Collected Specimen — 93.5; 100; 100 percentage of agreement

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Menstrual Blood Analysis (Menstrual Blood Analysis) (Diagnostic_test)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Stanford University
Primary completion
Oct 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Agreement Between Modified Menstrual Pad and Clinician-Collected Specimen
93.5; 100; 100
PRIMARY
Agreement Between Self-collected Vaginal Swabs vs Clinician-collected Cervical Specimens With High-risk HPV-Positive Results
88.1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Preferred the Modified Menstrual Pad to Clinician-collected Cervical Specimens
78
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Opted Out of Self-swab Due to Discomfort With the Procedure
32

Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of assessing HR-HPV DNA and HPV E6/E7 mRNA via self-collected menstrual blood in a smart menstrual pad. In other words, can the investigators detect the high risk strains of the human papilloma virus (HPV) that are associated with cervical cancer in self-collected menstrual blood, as an alternative to collecting vaginal swabs.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

There will be two study groups: 1) menstruating women over the age of 18 who have previous history of HR-HPV in the last 18 months and 2) menstruating women over the age of 18 who do not have a previous history of HR-HPV.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Women younger than 18 years old or are not menstruating regularly
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03638427). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search