Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=155 Randomized Single-blind Diagnostic

Imagio Feasibility Multi-Reader, Multi-Case Study

Breast Cancer

Enrolled (actual)
155
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: The Gain in Imagio IUS Alone Specificity vs Imagio (IUS+OA) Specificity at Fixed 95-99% Sensitivity (fSp), Cohort 1 — 80.9; 75.4; 78.7; 71.4 Percent of correct benign masses

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Imagio (IUS+OA) (Device); Imagio Ultrasound (Device); Mammography (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Seno Medical Instruments Inc.
Primary completion
Dec 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
The Gain in Imagio IUS Alone Specificity vs Imagio (IUS+OA) Specificity at Fixed 95-99% Sensitivity (fSp), Cohort 1
80.9; 75.4; 78.7; 71.4; 75.8; 66.1
SECONDARY
Partial Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (pAUC), Cohort 1
2.6; 3.0
SECONDARY
BiRads [Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System] Downgrades and Upgrades- Cohort 1
38.5; 49.1
SECONDARY
The Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR) for IUS vs. Imagio® (IUS+OA), Cohort 1
.049; .094
SECONDARY
SenoGram Usage Cohort 1 for Imagio (IUS+OA) Only
NA; 111
SECONDARY
SenoGram Performance
NA; 62.2
SECONDARY
SenoGram Performance
NA; 62.2

Summary

Controlled, blinded, multi-reader, multi-case study

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female subjects participating in the PIONEER-0 Study of the Imagio Breast Imaging System with known clinical status

Exclusion Criteria

  • Female subjects who did not have known clinical status in the PIONEER-0 Study of the Imagio Breast Imaging System with known clinical status
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03708393). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search