Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=125 Randomized Single-blind Other

The Effects of Manipulating Expectations in a Gratitude Intervention

Gratitude + No Expectations · Gratitude + Expectations · Events Control

Enrolled (actual)
125
Serious AEs
Results posted
Jun 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) — 26.15; 21.29; 24.37; 26.78 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Gratitude + No Expectations Intervention (Behavioral); Gratitude + Expectations Intervention (Behavioral); Events Control Intervention (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Primary completion
Feb 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
26.15; 21.29; 24.37; 26.78; 23.21; 23.95
PRIMARY
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF): Hedonic Well-Being SubScale
5.86; 4.95; 5.84; 6.24; 5.03; 5.39
PRIMARY
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF): Eudaimonic Well-Being SubScale
20.21; 16.34; 18.53; 20.52; 18.18; 18.55
SECONDARY
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Scale
21.05; 25.43; 20.71; 19.17; 23.38; 20.61
SECONDARY
Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Duration Items
6.56; 5.91; 6.30; 6.86; 6.26; 6.68
SECONDARY
Modified Differential Emotions Scale (MDES): Positive Emotions Subscale
2.86; 2.57; 2.78; 2.85; 2.71; 2.84
SECONDARY
Perceived Stress Scale - 4 (PSS-4)
7.05; 7.95; 6.03; 6.62; 6.89; 6.16
SECONDARY
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
17.21; 21.95; 17.08; 17.40; 18.47; 17.08
SECONDARY
Modified Differential Emotions Scale (MDES): State Gratitude
3.07; 2.95; 3.11; 3.05; 3.05; 3.13

Summary

Gratitude - an emotion felt when an individual receives something beneficial from other people or entities - has been shown to positively affect well-being. Beginning in 2003, "count your blessings" interventions - in which participants list items they are grateful for, and gratitude letter writing interventions were designed to cultivate gratitude. Gratitude interventions have many positive outcomes; they can increase well-being and life satisfaction (Froh, Sefick, & Emmons, 2008) and increase self-esteem (Rash, Matsuba, & Prkachin, 2011) to name a few. Knowing the benefits of gratitude prior to an intervention could affect participant behavior and health outcomes. Past studies have illustrated that sharing information about treatments changes expectations and improves outcomes (Zion & Crum, 2018). For instance, overt medical treatments are more effective than hidden ones (Colloca, Lopiano, Lanotte, & Benedetti, 2004). The proposed study is designed to evaluate whether expectations about intervention efficacy can enhance the benefits of a brief gratitude intervention. Specifically, the investigators will test if providing information on the benefits of gratitude will enhance intervention outcomes. This 3-armed randomized controlled trial will have the following conditions: gratitude + expectation, gratitude, and events control. Participants will be undergraduate college students and the online intervention will last two weeks. Participants in the two gratitude conditions will login to an online form three times a week for two weeks and make entries of up to five things they are grateful for. The form for participants in the gratitude + expectation condition will also provide information about benefits of gratitude. An everyday events control will be used to provide a neutral comparison condition. This group will be instructed to type up to five things or events of note from their day on their form. Outcome measures will be collected via an online survey before and immediately after the intervention. The primary outcome is well-being and the secondary outcomes are sleep quality and quantity, state gratitude, positive affect, healthcare self-efficacy, stress, and depressive symptoms. The investigators predict that participants in the gratitude + expectation condition will have enhanced intervention outcomes compared to participants in comparison conditions.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Undergraduate Student
  • Proficient in English
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Has a valid email address
  • Access to the internet

Exclusion Criteria

-No other exclusion criteria (aside from meeting the inclusion criteria above)

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03784001). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search