Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=21

Lung Ultrasound in PD Patients

Peritoneal Dialysis · Hypervolemia · VEGF Overexpression

Enrolled (actual)
21
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Serum VEGF-C Level (pg/ml) by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay — 0.29; 0.25; 0.33 ng/ml — p=0.039

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
NT-BNP, VEGF (Diagnostic_test); Echocardiography (Diagnostic_test); Chest Radiography (Radiation); Lung Ultrasound (Diagnostic_test); Bioelectrical Impedence Analysis (Diagnostic_test)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Primary completion
Sep 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Serum VEGF-C Level (pg/ml) by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
0.29; 0.25; 0.33 0.039 sig
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Dyspnea by Questionnaire
25; 11.1
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Class of New York Heart Association Classification
91.7; 100
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Presence of Third Sound/Pretibial Edema by Auscultation/Edema by Physical Examination
0; 0
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound Left Ventricle End Diastolic Diameter (mm) Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
4.75; 4.3
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound Interventricular Septum Thickness (mm) Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
1.0; 1.0
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B by Ultrasound and Posterior Wall Thickness (mm) Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
1.0; 0.9
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Ejection Fraction (%) Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
61; 60
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume (ml) Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
100; 94
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Left Atrial Volume (ml) Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
36; 37
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Left Ventricle Mass Index (g/m2) Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
100.5; 75
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Left Ventricle Filling Velocity (cm/Sec) Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
78.5; 74
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Early Mitral Inflow Velocity and Mitral Annular Early Diastolic Velocity (E/E') Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
11.6; 10.7
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (mmHg) Obtained by the Cardiologist With Echocardiography
24; 24
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and Bioimpedance Analysis [Assessed With the Body Composition Monitor; Normovolemic if Their Result Between -1,1 lt and 1,1 lt)
0.8; 1.3
SECONDARY
Association Between Number of Kerley B Lines by Ultrasound and NT-proBNP Level (pg/ml) by Elecsys proBNP Immunoassay
3024; 2217

Summary

Although many alternative methods are present, maintaining ideal volume status in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients still rely on clinical evaluation due to lack of an evidence based method. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a new method for evaluation of hidden congestion in this group. LUS findings and its relationship with other volumetric methods are investigated in this study. LUS was performed to all peritoneal dialysis patients and compared with symptoms of hypervolemia, physical examination, vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, chest radiography, echocardiography, bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients older than 18 years old,
  • History of PD more than 3 months,
  • Providing written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients younger than 18 years old,
  • Unwilling to participate to the study,
  • Immobile patients unable to perform test in the same day,
  • History of PD less than 3 months,
  • Presence of active infection,
  • History of lung cancer and/or operations.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03801044). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search