Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=261 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Controlled Trial of Erenumab in Migraine Prevention

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03812224 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
261
Serious AEs
2.1%
Results posted
Mar 2021
Primary outcomePrimary: Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the Double-blind Treatment Period — -1.98; -3.60 migraine days / month — p=<0.001
◆ Published Evidence
Established
22citations · ~4 / year
Efficacy and safety of erenumab in Japanese migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure or concomitant preventive treatment: subgroup analyses of a phase 3, randomized trial.
The journal of headache and pain · 2021 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of erenumab for prevention of migraine in Japanese adults with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM).

Linked Publications (4)

  • Efficacy and safety of erenumab in Japanese migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure or concomitant preventive treatment: subgroup analyses of a phase 3, randomized trial.
    The journal of headache and pain · 2021 · 22 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Immunogenicity of erenumab: A pooled analysis of six placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions.
    Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022 · 9 citations · Likely link
  • Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in Japanese patients with episodic and chronic migraine: results from a 28-week open-label treatment period of a randomised trial.
    BMJ open · 2023 · 7 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Experiences of Migraine and Erenumab Treatment in Japan: Qualitative Interviews with Clinical Trial Participants.
    The patient · 2026 · 0 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the Double-blind Treatment Period
-1.98; -3.60 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Monthly Migraine Days Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the DBTP
16.8; 31.5 0.005 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Acute Migraine-specific Medication Treatment Days Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the DBTP
-1.10; -2.57 <0.001 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject has provided informed consent/assent prior to initiation of any study specific activities/procedures.
  • Japanese subjects greater than or equal to 20 to less than or equal to 65 years of age upon entry into screening.
  • History of migraine (with or without aura) for greater than or equal to 12 months before screening according to the International Headache Society Classification ICHD-3 (Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society, 2018) based on medical records and/or patient self-report
  • Migraine frequency: Chronic Migraine (CM) or Episodic Migraine (EM) over the 3 months before screening based on the following criteria:
  • CM is defined as greater than or equal to 15 headache days per month of which greater than or equal to 8 headache days on average across the 3 months meet criteria as migraine days
  • EM is defined as less than 15 headache days per month of which at least 4 or more headache days on average across the 3 months meet criteria as migraine days

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects greater than 50 years of age at migraine onset.
  • History of cluster headache or hemiplegic migraine headache.
  • Unable to differentiate migraine from other headaches.
  • Migraine with continuous pain, in which the subject does not experience any pain-free periods (of any duration) during the 1 month before the screening period.
  • Malignancy, except non-melanoma skin cancers, cervical or breast ductal carcinoma in situ within the last 5 years.

Other exclusion criteria may apply

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03812224) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search