Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=444 Randomized Double-blind Health Services Research

Comparative Effectiveness of Family vs. Individually Focused Diabetes Education and Support

Diabetes · High Blood Pressure · High Blood Sugar · Hypertension
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03812614 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
444
Serious AEs
8.6%
Results posted
Feb 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Change From Baseline in Patient Glycemic Control at 6 Months — -0.43; -0.97 percentage — p=0.07

Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a novel program-Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT) - to individual patient-focused diabetes self-management education and support (I-DSMES).

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Patient Glycemic Control at 6 Months
-0.43; -0.97 0.07
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Patient Glycemic Control at 12 Months
-0.67; -0.65 0.96
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Patient Systolic Blood Pressure at 6 Months
-0.85; 0.66 0.55
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Patient Systolic Blood Pressure at 12 Months
2.69; -3.05 0.03 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Patient Diabetes Distress at 6 Months
-2.68; -2.40 0.76
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Patient Diabetes Distress at 12 Months
-2.67; -2.34 0.72
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline Patient Diabetes Self-care Behaviors at 6 Months: Healthy Eating
0.14; 0.37 0.38
SECONDARY
Change in Diabetes Self-care Behaviors in Patient: Physical Activity
0.22; 0.56 0.45
SECONDARY
Change in Diabetes Self-care Behaviors in Patient: Medication Adherence
0.01; 0.27; 0.04; 0.05; -0.02; 0.39 0.40
SECONDARY
Change in Self-efficacy of Patient
0.09; 0.59 0.06
SECONDARY
Change in Patient Activation in Patient
3.18; 3.54 0.92
SECONDARY
Patient Perceived Overall Satisfaction With SP Support for Diabetes
0.38; -0.37 0.11
SECONDARY
Patient Perception of SP Support: Supportive and Non-supportive Behaviors
0.22; 0.04 0.34
SECONDARY
Impact of COVID on Ability to Manage Diabetes
6; 4; 53; 64; 2; 1
SECONDARY
Change in Diabetes Distress in Support Person
0.45; -0.74 0.49
SECONDARY
Change in Self-efficacy of Support Person
0.07; -0.72 0.08

Eligibility Criteria

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes
  • Most recent HbA1c done in the 3 months prior to screening phone call >= 7.5%
  • Plan to use recruiting site for health care over the next 12 months after enrollment
  • Must be able to identify a family member or friend who is willing to be involved in their health care

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis (active or prior) of Alzheimer's disease or dementia
  • Preferred language is not English or Spanish
  • Diagnosis (active or prior) of schizophrenia or other psychotic/delusional disorder in CHASS EMR Problem list as of screening call date
  • Diagnosis of gestational diabetes without any other diabetes diagnoses
  • Diagnosed with diabetes at age < 21 years
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months
  • Concerns that may make it difficult to participate (ongoing health issues, personal events, etc.)
  • Have a life-limiting severe illness (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring oxygen)

Support Person Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to attend intervention sessions in person or remotely via online video-conferencing
  • At least 21 years old

Support Person Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not speak English or Spanish
  • Receives pay for caring for the patient
  • Has self-reported serious mental illness (schizophrenia)
  • Has a life-limiting severe illness (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring oxygen)
  • Has significant cognitive impairment (Alzheimer's disease or dementia)
  • Lives in a nursing home or long-term care facility
  • Concerns that may make it difficult to participate (ongoing health issues, personal events, etc.)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03812614). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search