Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=76 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Safety and Efficacy Study of MT-2990 in Women With Endometriosis

Endometrial Related Pain

Enrolled (actual)
76
Serious AEs
1.3%
Results posted
Jul 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) — -0.28; -0.63 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
MT-2990 (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Tanabe Pharma America, Inc.
Primary completion
May 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)
-0.28; -0.63
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)
-0.47; -0.68
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)
-0.38; -0.57
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP) Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain)
-1.05; -2.33
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain)
-1.33; -2.28
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale Ranging From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain)
-1.32; -2.74
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in the Number of Any Analgesic Pills Used
-0.33; -0.27
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in the Number of Opioid Pills Used
-0.01; -0.04
SECONDARY
Time to Use of Rescue Medication (Analgesic)
42.0; 19.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of NMPP Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)
34.4; 55.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Dysmenorrhea Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)
34.4; 37.9
SECONDARY
Percentage of Dyspareunia Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From None (0) to 3 (Severe)
36.4; 37.5
SECONDARY
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)
-18.87; -37.29
SECONDARY
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)
-21.92; -30.95
SECONDARY
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)
-26.95; -20.88
SECONDARY
Percentage of NMPP Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)
25.0; 48.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Dysmenorrhea Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)
34.4; 51.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Dyspareunia Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)
31.6; 47.6
SECONDARY
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)
-21.2; -43.07
SECONDARY
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)
-18.54; -31.37
SECONDARY
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)
-29.04; -40.8
SECONDARY
Number of Responders Using Global 7-point Scale
12; 18
SECONDARY
Percentage of Responders Using Global 7-point Scale
40.0; 58.1
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 on the Pain Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)
-15.58; -19.32; -19.48; -28.60; -20.03; -34.12
SECONDARY
Number of Responders Using Endometriosis Specific 7-point Scale
14; 19
SECONDARY
Percentage of Responders Using Endometriosis Specific 7-point Scale
46.7; 61.3
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Control and Powerlessness Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)
-19.80; -24.39; -25.47; -33.78; -26.66; -38.03
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Emotional Well-Being Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)
-13.31; -13.06; -16.54; -19.01; -15.50; -23.52
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Social Support Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)
-13.77; -12.21; -22.28; -17.85; -21.35; -23.45
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Self-Image Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)
-17.39; -14.65; -23.20; -21.01; -17.65; -26.45

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of MT-2990 for treatment of moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain in women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Provide written informed consent to participate in this study
  • Agree to approximately 30-90 day washout interval of hormonal therapies, if applicable
  • Have a history of regular menstrual cycles
  • Have a body mass index 3 cm or simple ovarian cyst > 5 cm, clinically significant endometrial pathology, single fibroid ≥ 4 cm or multiple (> 4) fibroids that measure ≥ 2 cm or symptomatic submucosal fibroid of any size
  • Have a current history of undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03840993). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search