Phase 2
N=76
Safety and Efficacy Study of MT-2990 in Women With Endometriosis
Endometrial Related Pain
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03840993 ↗Enrolled (actual)
76
Serious AEs
1.3%
Results posted
Jul 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) — -0.28; -0.63 units on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Interventions
- MT-2990 (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
- Age
- Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- Female
- Sponsor
- Tanabe Pharma America, Inc.
- Primary completion
- May 2021
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) |
-0.28; -0.63 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) |
-0.47; -0.68 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) |
-0.38; -0.57 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP) Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain) |
-1.05; -2.33 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain) |
-1.33; -2.28 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale Ranging From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain) |
-1.32; -2.74 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in the Number of Any Analgesic Pills Used |
-0.33; -0.27 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in the Number of Opioid Pills Used |
-0.01; -0.04 | — |
| SECONDARY Time to Use of Rescue Medication (Analgesic) |
42.0; 19.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of NMPP Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) |
34.4; 55.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Dysmenorrhea Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) |
34.4; 37.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Dyspareunia Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From None (0) to 3 (Severe) |
36.4; 37.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) |
-18.87; -37.29 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) |
-21.92; -30.95 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe) |
-26.95; -20.88 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of NMPP Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever) |
25.0; 48.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Dysmenorrhea Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever) |
34.4; 51.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Dyspareunia Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever) |
31.6; 47.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever) |
-21.2; -43.07 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever) |
-18.54; -31.37 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever) |
-29.04; -40.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Responders Using Global 7-point Scale |
12; 18 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Responders Using Global 7-point Scale |
40.0; 58.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 on the Pain Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best) |
-15.58; -19.32; -19.48; -28.60; -20.03; -34.12 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Responders Using Endometriosis Specific 7-point Scale |
14; 19 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Responders Using Endometriosis Specific 7-point Scale |
46.7; 61.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Control and Powerlessness Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best) |
-19.80; -24.39; -25.47; -33.78; -26.66; -38.03 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Emotional Well-Being Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best) |
-13.31; -13.06; -16.54; -19.01; -15.50; -23.52 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Social Support Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best) |
-13.77; -12.21; -22.28; -17.85; -21.35; -23.45 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Self-Image Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best) |
-17.39; -14.65; -23.20; -21.01; -17.65; -26.45 | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of MT-2990 for treatment of moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain in women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Provide written informed consent to participate in this study
- Agree to approximately 30-90 day washout interval of hormonal therapies, if applicable
- Have a history of regular menstrual cycles
- Have a body mass index 3 cm or simple ovarian cyst > 5 cm, clinically significant endometrial pathology, single fibroid ≥ 4 cm or multiple (> 4) fibroids that measure ≥ 2 cm or symptomatic submucosal fibroid of any size
- Have a current history of undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03840993). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.