Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=298 Diagnostic

Diagnostic US for Reduction of Benign Breast Biopsies Using US-guided Optical Tomography

Breast Biopsy

Enrolled (actual)
298
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Impact of US-guided DOT on the Potential Reduction of Benign Biopsies as Measured by Comparing the Reads With a Non- Suspicious Assessment of Conventional Imaging (CI) Alone Versus CI & US-DOT — 148 BIRADS assessments

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Hand-held hybrid probe (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Primary completion
Jul 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Impact of US-guided DOT on the Potential Reduction of Benign Biopsies as Measured by Comparing the Reads With a Non- Suspicious Assessment of Conventional Imaging (CI) Alone Versus CI & US-DOT
148
PRIMARY
Impact of US-guided DOT as an Adjunct to Conventional Breast Imaging on Maintaining High Sensitivity as Measured by Comparing the False Negative Rate or Missing Malignancy of Conventional Imaging (CI=US +/- Mammography) Alone Versus CI & US-DOT
5
PRIMARY
Assess the Impact of Adjunctive US-guided DOT Data in the Management of Discordant Pathology Results

Summary

Ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography (DOT) has demonstrated its potential role in differentiating malignant and benign breast abnormalities and in predicting and monitoring the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response of breast cancer. This unique approach employs a commercial ultrasound (US) transducer and near infrared (NIR) optical imaging sensors mounted on a hand-held US probe. The co-registered US is used for lesion localization, and optical sensors are used for imaging tumor related vascularity.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female subjects ≥ 18 years old with ultrasound visible breast abnormalities (BI-RADS 3*, 4A, 4B, 4C, and 5) referred for ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy or fine needle aspiration

*note that while a BI-RADS 3 assessment is probably benign, a subset of patients with this assessment choose to undergo biopsy rather than follow up imaging).

  • Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Lesions located in the darkly pigmented nipple-areolar complex area
  • Subjects with breast implants
  • Abnormality in the mirror image location of the contralateral breast.
  • Additional abnormalities in the same region of the breast that would be included in US-guided DOT imaging of the abnormality undergoing biopsy
  • Previous breast irradiation of the mirror image location of the contralateral breast
  • Lesions located at previous biopsy sites when biopsy occurred within the last six months.
  • Pregnancy
  • Superficial abnormalities located entirely within (i.e. less than) 5mm of the overlying skin
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03842358). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search