N/A
N=2,105
The United States Healthy Living Study
Colo-rectal Cancer
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03867409 ↗Enrolled (actual)
2,105
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Intention to Talk to Doctor About Colorectal Cancer Screening — 4.14; 4.0; 3.59; 3.48 units on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- message delivered via virtual technology (Behavioral)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Florida
- Primary completion
- Mar 2019
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Intention to Talk to Doctor About Colorectal Cancer Screening |
4.14; 4.0; 3.59; 3.48 | — |
| PRIMARY Intention to Screen for Colorectal Cancer |
4.03; 3.91; 3.57; 3.50 | — |
| PRIMARY Intention to Talk About Screening With FIT |
4.12; 4.03; 3.65; 3.50 | — |
| PRIMARY Intention to Recommend Intervention (ALEX) |
1.35; 1.36; 1.60; 1.66 | — |
| PRIMARY Source Credibility |
4.54; 4.42; 4.35; 4.23 | — |
| PRIMARY Argument Strength |
4.68; 4.57; 4.48; 4.39 | — |
| PRIMARY Homophily |
3.05; 3.04; 2.71; 2.75 | — |
| PRIMARY Usability of App |
4.48; 4.33; 4.30; 4.18 | — |
| PRIMARY Perceived Severity |
4.47; 4.48; 4.55; 4.51 | — |
| PRIMARY Perceived Susceptibility |
3.10; 3.04; 3.35; 3.30 | — |
| PRIMARY Response Efficacy |
4.09; 4.14; 4.16; 4.12 | — |
| PRIMARY Self-Efficacy |
4.37; 4.32; 4.40; 4.27 | — |
| PRIMARY Perceived Barriers |
1.86; 1.92; 1.95; 2.04 | — |
| PRIMARY Perceived Benefits |
4.2; 4.18; 4.18; 4.06 | — |
| PRIMARY Comparative Risk Feedback |
5.18; 5.19; 5.15; 5.13 | — |
| PRIMARY Cancer Information Overload |
2.37; 2.49; 2.83; 2.97 | — |
| PRIMARY Perceived Message Relevance |
3.75; 3.66; 3.60; 3.48 | — |
| PRIMARY Trust in Physician |
3.86; 3.86; 3.66; 3.65 | — |
| PRIMARY Patient-Provider Communication |
4.13; 4.05; 3.86; 3.88 | — |
| PRIMARY Patient General Health |
3.09; 3.18; 3.20; 3.17 | — |
| PRIMARY Health Literacy (eHeals) |
3.98; 4.02; 3.83; 3.75 | — |
| PRIMARY Interpersonal Distance |
3.49; 3.39; 3.37; 3.26 | — |
| PRIMARY Attitudes Towards Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) - Sad |
1.59; 1.72; 1.67; 1.72 | — |
| PRIMARY Attitudes Towards Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) - Worried |
2.31; 2.51; 2.4; 2.47 | — |
| PRIMARY Attitudes Towards Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) - Relieved |
3.53; 3.36; 3.28; 3.05 | — |
| PRIMARY Attitudes Towards Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) - Tense |
2.50; 2.71; 2.51; 2.63 | — |
| PRIMARY Attitudes Towards Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) - Anxious |
2.58; 2.82; 2.64; 2.76 | — |
| PRIMARY Attitudes Towards Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) - Calm |
3.30; 3.18; 3.09; 3.00 | — |
| PRIMARY Attitudes Towards Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) - Afraid |
2.28; 2.48; 2.32; 2.40 | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study is to pilot test the efficacy of a patient-centered, tailored message intervention delivered via virtual human technology for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within guidelines. Although participation is not limited to these groups, the study team is particularly interested in the feasibility of the intervention for reaching racial/ethnic minority and rural patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- reside within the United States but outside of Florida
- speak English
- are of either black or white racial background.
- are out-of-guidelines for colorectal cancer screening (>10 years for colonoscopy, >3 years for Cologuard, > 1 year for fecal immunochemical test)
Exclusion Criteria
- does not meet the above criteria
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03867409). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.