Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=140 Randomized Quadruple-blind Supportive Care

Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Pain Levels

Enrolled (actual)
140
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Onset Time of Surgical Anesthesia — 422; 655 seconds

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
25G Dural Puncture Epidural (Device); Standard Epidural (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
University of Arkansas
Primary completion
Oct 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Onset Time of Surgical Anesthesia
422; 655
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Inadequate Neuraxial Analgesia or Anesthesia
11; 24

Summary

This study will compare two anesthetics techniques called Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) and Standard Epidural as to which of the two can provide faster and potentially better at providing pain relief for cesarean sections. It will also compare these two anesthetics techniques on the percentage of women who require additional drugs to control pain during their cesarean deliveries. The results of this study will help anesthesiologists know which anesthetic technique can provide faster and potentially better at providing pain relief for cesarean sections.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Gestation > 36 weeks
  • ASA class II and III
  • Provides written consent
  • Infant of mother
  • Elective or non-urgent cesarean delivery

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal
  • Urgent/emergent cesarean sections
  • ASA and IV or above
  • Unable to understand English
  • Significant back surgery or scoliosis
  • Lethal fetal abnormality or likely to affect APGAR scores
  • Weight > 120 kg
  • Height < 150 cm
  • Allergy to study solutions
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03915574). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search