Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=230 Double-blind Diagnostic

Study of a Hand-held Device Plus Mobile App Versus Standard Eye Care Devices in Measuring Refractive Error of the Eye

Refractive Errors · Astigmatism
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03929588 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
230
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2022
Primary outcomePrimary: BVCA Utilizing Refraction Results From Handheld Device Compared to Manual Refraction Methods for the Age Stratum 45 Through 65 Years — 0.06; 0.02; 0.03 logMAR

Summary

Single-center, open-label, prospective study in healthy volunteers desiring refraction for correction of visual acuity to compare a handheld device supported by a mobile application with the phoropter and autorefractor.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
BVCA Utilizing Refraction Results From Handheld Device Compared to Manual Refraction Methods for the Age Stratum 45 Through 65 Years
0.06; 0.02; 0.03

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or Female
  • Age 30 through 65 years at the time of consent
  • Binocular vision
  • Subject desires refraction for correction of visual acuity and vision can be corrected in each eye to 20/20 (LogMAR 0.0)
  • Willing and able to give informed consent and follow all study procedures and requirements
  • Ability to speak and understand the English language

Exclusion Criteria

  • Spherical correction > +8 or 5 diopters)
  • Macular hole
  • Eye surgery within the last 12 months (including Lasik or lens replacement)
  • Subject does not have the physical dexterity to properly operate the device or the on the smartphone in the investigator's opinion.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03929588). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search